# The Safety and Efficacy of Glibenclamide in Managing Cerebral Edema After Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

## TL;DR

This study reviews the use of glibenclamide in treating brain swelling after a type of brain hemorrhage, finding limited effectiveness but acceptable safety.

## Contribution

The study introduces oral glibenclamide as a novel approach for cerebral edema in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.

## Key findings

- Oral glibenclamide showed no significant improvement in neurological outcomes or functional independence.
- Hypoglycemia risk was significantly higher in patients receiving glibenclamide.
- Intravenous glibenclamide shows promise for future research due to better pharmacokinetics.

## Abstract

Background/Objectives: We sought to determine if glibenclamide, a sulfonylurea receptor 1-transient receptor potential melastatin 4 (SUR1-TRPM4) channel blocker, reduces cerebral edema and improves neurological functioning in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). Methods: Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and SCOPUS for studies evaluating glibenclamide in aSAH patients. Primary outcomes included scores on the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at discharge and the Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Early Brain Edema Score (SEBES) at ten days post-intervention. Secondary outcomes included adverse events, and safety and efficacy endpoints. Random-effects models were employed for meta-analyses. Results: Three studies utilizing oral glibenclamide (n = 245) met inclusion criteria. Oral glibenclamide demonstrated no significant improvements in mRS scores [MD −0.19 with 95% CI (−2.05, 1.66)] at discharge, [MD 0.06, (−0.60, 0.71)] at 3 months, and [MD 0.4, (−0.67, 0.87)] at 6 months; functional independence [risk ratio (RR) 1.05, (0.81, 1.36)]; independent ambulation [RR 1.07, (0.77, 1.48)]; mortality [RR 0.79, (0.42, 1.50)]; or delayed cerebral ischemia [RR 0.58, (0.31, 1.09]). Hypoglycemia risk was significantly higher in the glibenclamide group [RR 3.92, (1.14, 13.49)]. Conclusions: Oral glibenclamide offers a novel approach to addressing cerebral edema in aSAH but shows limited clinical efficacy in improving functional and neurological outcomes in subtherapeutic doses. Its safety profile is acceptable, though hypoglycemia risk necessitates careful monitoring. Further research is required to optimize dosing, timing of intervention, and patient selection to enhance therapeutic outcomes. By contrast, intravenous administration of therapeutic doses of glibenclamide offers a promising avenue for future studies in the management of aSAH by taking advantage of the favorable pharmacokinetics of this route of administration.