Automated Analysis of Vertebral Body Surface Roughness for Adult Age Estimation: Ellipse Fitting and Machine-Learning Approach
Erhan Kartal, Yasin Etli
TL;DR
This paper introduces a new automated method using CT scans and machine learning to estimate adult age based on vertebral surface roughness.
Contribution
The novel contribution is an objective, automated age estimation method using ellipse fitting and machine learning on vertebral CT data.
Findings
Surface roughness metrics (DS) showed strong correlation with age (peak r = 0.60 at L3–L5).
Random forest achieved the best accuracy with an SEE of 8.49 years in males.
The method offers a transparent and observer-independent alternative to deep learning pipelines.
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Vertebral degenerative features are promising but often subjectively scored indicators for adult age estimation. We evaluated an objective surface roughness metric, the “average distance to the fitted ellipse” score (DS), calculated automatically for every vertebra from C7 to S1 on routine CT images. Methods: CT scans of 176 adults (94 males, 82 females; 21–94 years) were retrospectively analyzed. For each vertebra, the mean orthogonal deviation of the anterior superior endplate from an ideal ellipse was extracted. Sex-specific multiple linear regression served as a baseline; support vector regression (SVR), random forest (RF), k-nearest neighbors (k-NN), and Gaussian naïve-Bayes pseudo-regressor (GNB-R) were tuned with 10-fold cross-validation and evaluated on a 20% hold-out set. Performance was quantified with the standard error of the estimate (SEE). Results:…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12
Figure 13
Figure 14
Figure 15
Figure 16
Figure 17
Figure 18
Figure 19
Figure 20
Figure 21
Figure 22
Figure 23
Figure 24
Figure 25
Figure 26
Figure 27
Figure 28
Figure 29
Figure 30
Figure 31
Figure 32
Figure 33
Figure 34
Figure 35
Figure 36
Figure 37
Figure 38
Figure 39
Figure 40
Figure 41
Figure 42
Figure 43
Figure 44
Figure 45
Figure 46
Figure 47
Figure 48
Figure 49
Figure 50Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsForensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies · Autopsy Techniques and Outcomes · Medical Imaging and Analysis