Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous Thrombolysis Beyond 4.5 Hours in Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Muhammad Ahmad, Chavin Akalanka Ranasinghe, Mais Omar Abu-Sa’da, Durga Prasad Bhimineni, Muhammed Ameen Noushad, Talal Warsi, Ahmad Mesmar, Munikaverappa Anjanappa Mukesh, Sagar K. Patel, Gabriel Imbianozor, Ali Mustansir Bhatty, Ahmad Alareed, Quratul Ain, Eeshal Zulfiqar

TL;DR
This study finds that intravenous thrombolysis can still help some stroke patients even after the 4.5-hour window, though it increases the risk of certain types of bleeding.
Contribution
The study provides updated evidence on the efficacy and safety of IVT beyond the standard 4.5-hour window using recent randomized trials.
Findings
IVT improved functional outcomes and neurological improvement in patients beyond 4.5 hours.
IVT increased the risk of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and parenchymal hemorrhage.
No significant increase in overall mortality or systemic bleeding was observed.
Abstract
Background: Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) is the standard treatment for ischemic stroke within 4.5 h of symptom onset. However, a significant proportion of patients present beyond this window. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of IVT beyond the 4.5 h window in selected patients. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted across PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar from inception to April 2025. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled using a random-effects model. Results: A total of 12 RCTs were included, with 3236 patients. Compared to controls, IVT significantly improved excellent functional outcomes [OR: 1.40; 95% CI: 1.21–1.62] and good functional outcomes [OR: 1.26; 95% CI: 1.06–1.50] at 90 days. IVT also improved recanalization [OR: 2.47; 95% CI: 1.96–3.12], reperfusion [OR: 2.20; 95% CI: 1.26–3.84], and early…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAcute Ischemic Stroke Management · Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management · Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
