Factors Influencing Virtual Art Therapy in Patients with Stroke

TL;DR

Virtual art therapy helps stroke patients by reducing fatigue and improving participation, with outcomes influenced by artwork appeal and patient condition.

Contribution

Identifies factors like esthetic valence and clinical conditions that influence virtual art therapy outcomes in stroke patients.

Findings

Higher esthetic valence of artworks increased patient participation in therapy.

Pre-treatment independence levels and participation scores predicted post-treatment independence.

Perceived fatigue had a complex influence on therapy outcomes.

Abstract

Background: Art therapy was recently administered to stroke patients using immersive virtual reality technology, chosen to provide the illusion of being able to replicate an artistic masterpiece. This approach was effective in improving rehabilitative outcomes due to the so-called Michelangelo effect: patients’ interaction with artistic stimuli reduced perceived fatigue and improved performance. The aim of the present study was to investigate which factors may influence those outcomes (e.g., type of artwork, esthetic valence, perceived fatigue, clinical conditions). Methods: An observational study was conducted on 25 patients with stroke who performed the protocol of virtual art therapy (VAT). In each trial, patients were asked to rate the esthetic valence of the artworks and their perceived fatigue, whereas therapists assessed patients’ participation in the therapy (Pittsburgh Rehabilitation Participation Scale, PRPS). Moreover, before and after treatment, patients’ independence in daily living activities (Barthel Index, BI), and their upper limb functioning (Manual Muscle Test, MMT) and spasticity (Ashworth Scale, AS) were measured. Results: The after-treatment BI scores depended on the before-treatment BI score (p < 0.001) and on the PRPS score (p = 0.006), which, in turn, was increased by the subjective esthetic valence (p = 0.044). Perceived fatigue is a complex factor that may have influenced the outcomes (p = 0.049). Conclusions: There was a general effect of art in reducing fatigue and improving participation of patients during therapy. The variability observed among patients mainly depended on their clinical conditions, but also on the esthetic valence given to each artwork, that could also be intertwined with the difficulty of the task. Art therapy has a high potential to improve rehabilitation outcomes, especially if combined with new technologies, but psychometric investigation of the effects of each factor is needed to design the most effective protocols.

Figures