Amylin Receptor 1 Mutagenesis Revealed a Potential Role of Calcitonin Serine 29 in Receptor Interaction

TL;DR

This study identifies key amino acids in the amylin receptor that are important for binding with specific peptides, suggesting ways to modify these interactions.

Contribution

The study identifies critical residues in the amylin receptor 1 extracellular domain and demonstrates how receptor modifications can influence ligand binding.

Findings

D101A and N135A mutations abolished peptide ligand binding, indicating their critical role.

N124A mutation reduced peptide binding affinity by over 8-fold.

N124D mutation restored binding affinity for salmon calcitonin but not for AC413.

Abstract

Background: The amylin receptor is a receptor for the peptide hormone amylin, and its activation is known to reduce body weight. The amylin receptor functions as a heterodimer complex that consists of the calcitonin receptor for peptide hormone calcitonin and an accessary protein. Although the structural information of amylin receptors is currently available, receptor–ligand binding studies that support the peptide binding mode for amylin receptors remain incomplete. Methods: Here, we introduced mutagenesis to the amylin receptor 1 extracellular domain and examined mutational effects on peptide binding affinity. We focused on several residues mainly from the peptide-binding pocket (D97, D101, E123, N124, and N135 of the calcitonin receptor). Two well-known peptide ligands for amylin receptors were used for this study: a salmon calcitonin fragment and an antagonist amylin analog AC413 fragment with Y25P mutation. Results: Among the introduced mutations, D101A and N135A mutations abolished peptide ligand binding, suggesting that these residues are critical for peptide interaction. The N124A mutation also significantly decreased the peptide binding affinity by more than 8-fold. Intriguingly, the N124D mutation restored the decreased affinity of the salmon calcitonin fragment, while it failed to restore the decreased affinity of the AC413 fragment. Structural analyses suggested that there was a potential role of salmon calcitonin serine 29 in the interaction with aspartate of the N124D mutation. Conclusions: This study validates the critical residues of the amylin receptor 1 extracellular domain for the interaction with C-terminal fragments of peptide ligands. This study also suggests that modulating receptor–ligand interaction is feasible by the modification of receptor amino acids near an interacting peptide ligand.

Figures