# Treatment of Chronic Neck Pain with Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: A Single-Blinded Randomized Clinical Trial

**Authors:** Manuel Rodríguez-Huguet, Miguel Ángel Rosety-Rodríguez, Daniel Rodríguez-Almagro, Rocío Martín-Valero, Maria Jesus Vinolo-Gil, Jorge Bastos-Garcia, Jorge Góngora-Rodríguez

PMC · DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines13071746 · 2025-07-17

## TL;DR

This study investigates the effectiveness of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in treating chronic neck pain compared to another therapy.

## Contribution

The study provides new evidence on the effectiveness of tDCS in improving pain and mobility in chronic neck pain patients.

## Key findings

- Both tDCS and TENS groups showed significant improvements in pain and mobility after treatment.
- The tDCS group showed more favorable changes in pressure pain threshold measurements compared to the TENS group.

## Abstract

Background/Objectives: Neck pain is defined as an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience associated with actual or potential tissue damage, affecting the cervical region. It represents one of the leading causes of disability, with a prevalence of 30%. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive electrotherapy technique that enables direct modulation of cortical excitability. It involves the application of a low-intensity electrical current to the scalp, targeting the central nervous system. The aim of this study was to analyze the effects of tDCS on functionality, pain, mobility, and pressure pain threshold in patients with chronic nonspecific neck pain. Methods: Thirty participants (18–60 years) were selected to receive ten treatment sessions over a four-week period using tDCS (CG = 15) or transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) (CG = 15), with the following various related variables evaluated: functionality (Neck Disability Index), pain intensity (NPRS), cervical range of motion (ROM), and pressure pain threshold (PPT). Assessments were conducted at baseline, post-treatment, one month, and three months after the intervention. Results: The within-group analysis revealed statistically significant improvements for both groups at post-treatment, one-month follow-up, and three-month follow-up. Conclusions: The comparison between groups shows favorable changes in the tDCS group for PPT measurements.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** Chronic Neck Pain (MESH:D019547), Neck (MESH:D006258), pain (MESH:D010146)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Figures

1 figure with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12292659/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12292659