Sex-Specific Patterns and Predictors of Reverse Left Ventricular Remodeling and Outcomes in STEMI Patients with LVEF ≤ 50% After Successful Primary Angioplasty
Bogdan-Flaviu Buz, Sergiu-Florin Arnautu, Mirela-Cleopatra Tomescu, Minodora Andor, Simina Crisan, Dan Gaita, Cristina Vacarescu, Constantin-Tudor Luca, Cristian Mornos, Dragos Cozma, Diana-Aurora Arnăutu

TL;DR
This study finds that men with heart attacks show better heart recovery than women, and this recovery is linked to better long-term outcomes.
Contribution
The study identifies sex-specific predictors of heart recovery after heart attacks and shows how these differences affect clinical outcomes.
Findings
Reverse remodeling occurred in 43% of patients, more frequently in men than women.
Baseline global work efficiency was a strong predictor of reverse remodeling.
Patients with reverse remodeling had significantly lower rates of major adverse cardiac events.
Abstract
Background: Sex-related differences in left ventricular (LV) reverse remodeling following ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) remain underexplored. We aimed to investigate predictors of reverse remodeling and its association with clinical outcomes, with a focus on sex-specific differences. Methods: We enrolled 253 STEMI patients (91 women, 28%) and assessed echocardiographic parameters at baseline and six months. LV reverse remodeling was defined as a ≥15% reduction in LV end-diastolic volume (LVEDV). Multivariate logistic regression identified independent predictors of remodeling. Clinical outcomes were evaluated over a median follow-up of 17 months (IQR 14–22 months), including major adverse cardiac events (MACEs). Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression analyses were performed. Results: Reverse remodeling occurred in 43% of patients and was more frequent in men than women (47%…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAcute Myocardial Infarction Research · Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair · Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
