Cartilage-Specific 18F-NaF Uptake in Rat Models: A Multimodal In Vitro and Ex Vitro Comparative Study with 99mTc-MDP
Qingxiao Li, Jianpeng Gao, Yiqun Wang, Yaoyao Song, Liwei Liu, Cong Zhang, Ming Li, Haodan Dang, Jiahe Tian

TL;DR
This study compares two imaging tracers, 18F-NaF and 99mTc-MDP, in rat models to understand their uptake in bone and cartilage, finding that 18F-NaF shows better imaging properties for cartilage.
Contribution
The study reveals that 18F-NaF has distinct advantages over 99mTc-MDP for imaging cartilage metabolism, particularly in relation to cellular activity and calcification.
Findings
18F-NaF showed faster blood/background clearance and higher target-to-background ratios compared to 99mTc-MDP in cartilage.
18F-NaF uptake in cancellous bone was significantly higher than that of 99mTc-MDP.
99mTc-MDP showed higher uptake in knee cartilage, and aged rats showed maximal knee cartilage accumulation.
Abstract
Background: 18F-NaF and 99mTc-MDP are widely used bone imaging tracers, but their comparative uptake in bone versus cartilage is unclear. This study aimed to directly compare these patterns in rats to guide musculoskeletal molecular imaging. Methods: Male Sprague-Dawley rats underwent in vivo and ex vivo radiotracer studies. Tracer uptake (%ID/g) was quantified in bone and cartilage at 30, 60, or 120 min post-injection (18F-NaF or 99mTc-MDP), and across different ages. Additional rats received subcutaneous implants of viable or devitalized bone and cartilage; uptake was assessed using PET/CT, autoradiography, and histology. Results: 18F-NaF showed faster blood/background clearance and higher target-to-background ratios compared to 99mTc-MDP, especially in weight-bearing joint cartilage. 18F-NaF uptake in cancellous bone significantly exceeded that of 99mTc-MDP, whereas 99mTc-MDP showed…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMedical Imaging and Pathology Studies · Bone health and treatments · Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications
