# Comparative Effects of Intermittent vs. Constant Ceftiofur Hydrochloride Exposure on Staphylococcus aureus In Vitro

## TL;DR

This study compares how different ways of using ceftiofur hydrochloride affect Staphylococcus aureus, finding that high-dose, long-term use is better at killing bacteria and preventing resistance.

## Contribution

The study reveals how dosing frequency and concentration influence resistance and bacterial survival in Staphylococcus aureus.

## Key findings

- High-dose, prolonged exposure eradicates bacteria without resistance development.
- Intermittent dosing promotes persistence, tolerance, and resistance evolution.
- Resistance-related genetic mutations were found only in specific intermittent dosing groups.

## Abstract

Background/Objectives: Ceftiofur hydrochloride (CEF) is a third-generation cephalosporin widely used in cattle to treat various disease. The recommended dosage was 1.1 to 2.2 mg/kg BW for 3 to 5 consecutive days by intramuscular or subcutaneous injection. Incomplete treatment, overuse, or misuse, often observed in clinical practice, are major contributors to resistance development. This study aims to explore how different concentrations, durations, and dosing frequencies affect susceptibility and bactericidal efficacy of Staphylococcus aureus to optimize CEF dosage regimens. Methods: First, CEF was intermittently administered at 1/2 × minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), 2 × MIC, 6 × MIC, and 100 × MIC for 30 cycles. Second, CEF was continuously administered for 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, and 168 h. Bacterial susceptibility, regrowth, survival rate, and the emergence of persisters or tolerant phenotypes were assessed. Genetic mutations were identified by whole-genome resequencing. Membrane permeability, integrity, and efflux pump activity were analyzed to elucidate the mechanism of CEF. Results: After 30 cycles, the MIC increased eight-fold in the 2 × MIC group. No significant MIC increase was found in other groups, but a progression from susceptibility to persistence and then to tolerance was observed in the 100 × MIC intermittent group. The survival rate increased both in the 2 × MIC and 100 × MIC groups. With continuous exposure to ≥6 × MIC over 120 h, strains were completely eradicated without MIC increase. Resistance-associated single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) mutations were detected only in strains of the 2 × MIC and 100 × MIC intermittent groups. CEF altered the membrane hydrophobicity, damaging membrane integrity after 30 cycles. Conclusions: These findings suggest that high-dose, prolonged exposure is more effective for eliminating Staphylococcus aureus and avoiding resistance, whereas intermittent dosing may promote persistence, tolerance, and resistance evolution.