# Influence of Different Litter Regimens on Ceca Microbiota Profiles in Salmonella-Challenged Broiler Chicks

**Authors:** Deji A. Ekunseitan, Scott H. Harrison, Ibukun M. Ogunade, Yewande O. Fasina

PMC · DOI: 10.3390/ani15142039 · Animals : an Open Access Journal from MDPI · 2025-07-11

## TL;DR

This study shows that using dirty litter in poultry housing improves chick health and growth by promoting a beneficial gut microbiome and reducing Salmonella.

## Contribution

The study reveals that dirty litter combined with Salmonella challenge enhances microbial diversity and chick performance.

## Key findings

- Dirty litter with Salmonella challenge increases feed intake and reduces pathogen levels in chicks.
- Dirty litter promotes higher microbial diversity and beneficial genera like Lactobacillus in chick ceca.
- Litter type and Salmonella interaction significantly affect feed conversion ratio and gut microbiome composition.

## Abstract

Poultry litter is a mixture of bedding materials and excreta of birds, resulting in a complex biological system of microbes making up its microbial population. Its management is a critical component in poultry production, with implications for the health and productivity of the birds. This study investigated litter type (dirty litter, DL; fresh litter, FL) and Salmonella Enteritidis on the microbiota composition of neonate broiler chicks. This study demonstrated that dirty litter with challenge promotes beneficial microbial diversity, enhances feed intake, and supports pathogen exclusion, indicating that strategic litter management can improve chick health and performance outcomes.

A 14-day study was conducted to evaluate the effect of litter type (dirty litter, DL; fresh litter, FL) and Salmonella Enteritidis SE challenge (no challenge, NC; challenge, SE) on the growth performance and cecal microbial composition of neonate chicks. Day-old chicks (n = 240, Ross 708 male) were allocated to a 2 × 2 factorial design consisting of four treatments: chicks raised on dirty litter (CONDL), chicks raised on fresh litter (CONFL); and chicks raised on litter types similar to CONDL and CONFL but inoculated with 7.46 × 108 CFU SE/mL at d 1 (CONDLSE and CONFLSE). The performance indices measured included body weight (BW), body weight gain (BWG), feed intake (FI), mortality, and feed conversion ratio (FCR). Cecal SE concentration was assessed on d 3 and 14, and ceca were collected from chicks on day 14 for DNA extraction. The Illumina Miseq platform was used for microbiome analysis of the V3–V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene. The interaction of litter type and SE influenced FCR and FI. CONDL recorded the poorest FCR (1.832). FI was highest and similar in CONFLSE, CONDL, and CONDLSE (0.655, 0.692, and 0.677, respectively). Cecal SE concentration was significantly reduced in CONDLSE at d 3 and 14. Alpha diversity was higher (p < 0.05) in the DL compared to that in NC. Beta diversity showed a separation (p < 0.05) between the DL and the FL. Comparative tree analysis revealed 21 differential significant genera, with 14 prevalent in the DL and 7 in the FL, specifically, bacteria genera such as Lactobacillus, Clostridia_vadinBB60_group, Lachnospira, Oscillospiraceae UCG_005, and Marvinbryantia, which play significant roles relating to improved growth performance, metabolic homeostasis within the gut, energy metabolism, and short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) utilization. Our results concluded that litter management regimen differentially alters the microbiome of chicks, which accounts for the improved performance and exclusion of pathogens in the study.

## Full-text entities

- **Chemicals:** SCFA (MESH:D005232), SE (MESH:D012643)
- **Species:** Lactobacillus (genus) [taxon 1578], Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Enteritidis (no rank) [taxon 149539]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12291792/full.md

## Figures

6 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12291792/full.md

## References

75 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12291792/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12291792