# Models of microbiome evolution incorporating host resource provisioning

**Authors:** Yao Xiao, Teng Li, Allen Rodrigo

PMC · DOI: 10.1093/ismeco/ycaf059 · ISME Communications · 2025-04-04

## TL;DR

This paper explores how hosts evolve to balance the costs and benefits of providing resources to manage their microbiomes.

## Contribution

The study introduces a computational model showing when resource provisioning for microbiomes evolves based on host-environment interactions.

## Key findings

- Resource provisioning evolves when hosts pass a high percentage of microbes to offspring and a low percentage to the environment.
- Hosts are less likely to provide resources for beneficial microbes if they can obtain them from the environment.
- Over time, resource provisioning is not favored due to its fitness cost to the host.

## Abstract

Multicellular hosts and their associated microbial partners (i.e. microbiomes) often interact in mutually beneficial ways. Consequently, hosts may choose to allocate resources to regulate and recruit appropriate microbes. In doing so, hosts may incur an energetic cost and, in turn, these costs can affect host fitness. It remains unclear how hosts have evolved to balance the costs of expending resources to manage their microbiomes against the benefits that might accrue by doing so. To address this question, we extend a previously developed agent-based computational model of host-microbiome evolution by incorporating a resource provisioning process, to determine how hosts have evolved to balance the costs and benefits of expending resources to manage their microbiomes. Our results indicate that resource provisioning will evolve when hosts provide a high percentage of microbes to their offspring and contribute a low percentage of their microbiome to the environment. In contrast, resource provisioning will not evolve when hosts contribute a high percentage of their microbiome to the environment. This is because hosts that do not provide resources to acquire microbes can nonetheless still acquire microbes from the environmental contributions of hosts that do provide such resources. Since resource provisioning incurs a fitness cost to the host, over evolutionary time, resource provisioning will not be favored. Our results also show that hosts are less likely to provide resources to acquire beneficial microbes if hosts can obtain a high proportion of these microbes from the environment.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** PE (MESH:D010981), HMS (MESH:C567355), MS (MESH:D015163), HS (MESH:D009155), fungal infections (MESH:D009181), RPP (MESH:D010335), infection (MESH:D007239)
- **Chemicals:** CO2 (MESH:D002245), PI (-)
- **Species:** Aliivibrio fischeri (species) [taxon 668], Lactobacillus (genus) [taxon 1578], Porifera (sponges, phylum) [taxon 6040], Graphosoma lineatum (North African striped bug, species) [taxon 57298], Bacillota (clostridial firmicutes, phylum) [taxon 1239], Methanobrevibacter smithii (species) [taxon 2173], Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606], Euprymna scolopes (species) [taxon 6613], Camponotus (carpenter ants, genus) [taxon 13390], Coreidae (leaf-footed bugs, family) [taxon 186376]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12291540/full.md

## Figures

6 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12291540/full.md

## References

39 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12291540/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12291540