# An evidence-based digital prescription opioid safety toolkit for national dissemination: co-design and user testing

**Authors:** Alex Waddell, Jessica L. Watterson, Dhruv Basur, Christopher Owen Prawira, Louisa Picco, Tina Lam, Patrick Olivier, Joshua Paolo Seguin, Liam Kay, Suzanne Nielsen

PMC · DOI: 10.3389/fdgth.2025.1600836 · Frontiers in Digital Health · 2025-07-11

## TL;DR

This paper describes the co-design and testing of a digital opioid safety toolkit to help consumers and professionals reduce opioid-related harm in Australia.

## Contribution

A novel co-design approach combining the TDF and Double-Diamond process to create a nationally disseminated opioid safety toolkit.

## Key findings

- The Toolkit promotes three key opioid safety behaviors: naloxone uptake, safety planning, and healthcare professional communication.
- User testing confirmed the Toolkit is easy to use and acceptable to both consumers and professionals.
- Factors influencing safety behaviors include knowledge, social/professional roles, and environmental resources.

## Abstract

Australia has one of the highest rates of opioid prescribing and prescription opioid-related harm in the world. Although effective for pain relief, the use of prescription opioids is a leading cause of preventable morbidity and mortality. Barriers exist for consumers identifying their own risk factors, accessing naloxone (opioid overdose antidote) and overdose prevention education. This study aimed to co-design a digital Opioid Safety Toolkit for national dissemination through pharmacies to encourage three consumer opioid safety behaviours: (1) uptake of naloxone, (2) creating a safety plan, and (3) discussing their use of opioids, including any concerns with their healthcare professional.

The digital Toolkit was co-designed and developed using a novel approach to digital health intervention design combining the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) and Double-Diamond design process. Co-design involved a series of seven iterative workshops with consumers (4) and professionals (3). Workshops focused on identifying factors influencing opioid safety behaviours, exploring design preferences, sense-checking, and ideation of the user flow. User testing was conducted with the penultimate version of the Toolkit.

13 consumers with lived experience of prescription opioid use and 14 professionals including prescribers, pharmacists, pain specialists, researchers and consumer advocates participated in up to three separate workshops. 15 consumers participated in user testing interviews. Analysis of workshops identified factors promoting safety behaviours including increased public awareness of naloxone, understanding personal risk (TDF domain of Knowledge); healthcare professional's role in education and consumers' experience of stigma (Social/professional role and identity); use of conversational aids to scaffold conversations, material resources and data ownership (Environment, context and resources). User testing elicited feedback pertaining to the information and resources on the website and the overall user interface and experience.

The Toolkit was co-designed with consumers and professionals to facilitate opioid safety behaviours. The Toolkit includes evidence-based information, tools for risk assessment and screening, opioid use monitoring, conversation aids, and a safety plan. The Toolkit is being disseminated nationally through Australian pharmacies following a randomized controlled trial that demonstrated the Toolkit promotes safety behaviours, is easy to use and acceptable to those with lived experience of prescription opioid use and professionals.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** pain (MESH:D010146), overdose (MESH:D062787), opioid overdose (MESH:D000083682)
- **Chemicals:** naloxone (MESH:D009270)

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12291169/full.md

## Figures

2 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12291169/full.md

## References

72 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12291169/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12291169