# What is the optimal biological therapy for moderate to severe ulcerative colitis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

**Authors:** Longbin Huang, Chen Kong, Ningning Yue, Hailan Zhao, Yuan Zhang, Chengmei Tian, Zhiliang Mai, Daoru Wei, Ruiyue Shi, Jun Yao, Lisheng Wang, Defeng Li

PMC · DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1602024 · Frontiers in Pharmacology · 2025-07-11

## TL;DR

This study compares the effectiveness and safety of various biologic drugs for treating moderate to severe ulcerative colitis, identifying the best options for inducing and maintaining remission.

## Contribution

The study provides an updated network meta-analysis comparing the efficacy and safety of biologics for ulcerative colitis, including new drugs and patient subgroups.

## Key findings

- Infliximab 5 mg/kg was most effective for induction therapy in biologic-naive patients.
- Vedolizumab was top-ranked for maintenance therapy outcomes.
- Ustekinumab and mirikizumab showed favorable safety profiles.

## Abstract

The biologics for moderate to severe ulcerative colitis (UC) have expanded with an increasing array. We performed an updated network meta-analysis to evaluate and compare the relative efficacy and safety profiles of biologics in moderate to severe UC.

We searched literature to 18 May 2024, to identify eligible studies. The clinical remission, clinical response, or endoscopic improvement, stratified by previous exposure or naive to biologics, and safety were assessed. A network meta-analysis was performed through the bayesian model, obtaining pairwise relative ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). The surface under the cumulative ranking probabilities (SUCRA) was used to rank the included agents for each outcome.

A total of 23 trials (10,839 patients) were included. In induction therapy, based on achieving clinical remission and endoscopic improvement, infliximab 5 mg/kg ranked first. For clinical response, ustekinumab 6 mg/kg superior to other drugs. Infliximab 5 mg/kg demonstrated superior efficacy in biologic-naive patients, whereas ustekinumab 6 mg/kg was the most effective in biologic-exposed patients. No significant differences between active interventions were observed when assessing safety outcomes, except for visilizumab. In maintenance therapy, for clinical remission and endoscopic improvement, vedolizumab 108 mg every other week and vedolizumab 300 mg every 4 weeks ranked first respectively, with infliximab 5 mg/kg performed best in achieving clinical response. Regarding safety ranking, golimumab 100 mg was the lowest.

In this network meta-analysis, infliximab and vedolizumab emerged as the most effective biologics for inducing and maintaining efficacy outcomes for patients with UC. Most drugs were found to be safe and well-tolerated, with ustekinumab and mirikizumab exhibiting particularly favorable safety profiles.

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** ulcerative colitis (MONDO:0005101)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** UC (MESH:D003093)
- **Chemicals:** Infliximab (MESH:D000069285), mirikizumab (MESH:C000708407), vedolizumab (MESH:C543529), ustekinumab (MESH:D000069549), visilizumab (MESH:C456519), golimumab (MESH:C529000)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12290297/full.md

## Figures

3 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12290297/full.md

## References

51 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12290297/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12290297