Difficulty With Binary Voting Among FDA Oncology Advisory Committee Members
Kaatje S. Greenberg, Joshua Hopen, Muhammad Draw, Matthew S. McCoy, Genevieve P. Kanter, Holly Fernandez Lynch

TL;DR
This study explores how often FDA advisory committee members report difficulty in voting to approve cancer drugs.
Contribution
The study provides new insights into the challenges faced by FDA advisory committee members during drug approval voting.
Findings
Members frequently report difficulty in binary voting decisions for drug approvals.
The qualitative analysis reveals factors influencing voting challenges in oncology drug approvals.
The study highlights the subjective nature of drug approval decisions in advisory committees.
Abstract
This qualitative study investigates the frequency of reports of difficulty in voting for drug approval by members of the Food and Drug Administration Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee.
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPharmaceutical industry and healthcare · Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy · Science, Research, and Medicine
