Diurnal variation and practice effects in saccade task performance

TL;DR

This study finds that saccadic eye movement task performance is not affected by the time of day but improves with repeated practice.

Contribution

The study experimentally dissociates diurnal variation effects from practice effects in saccade tasks for the first time.

Findings

Saccadic task performance showed no diurnal variation in accuracy, speed, or stability.

Task repetition significantly improved performance accuracy, speed, and stability.

There was no interaction between diurnal variation and practice effects.

Abstract

Saccadic eye movement tasks have been widely used as a probe for measuring cognitive functions in healthy humans as well as in patients with neurological and psychiatric disorders. Circadian variation has been shown to affect multiple aspects of cognitive function especially executive function related to prefrontal cortex. The effects of diurnal variation in saccadic task performance and the dissociation of these effects from repetition or practice effects has not been adequately addressed. In the current study thirty healthy adults performed several saccadic eye movement tasks including visually guided saccades, antisaccades and countermanding saccades in three consecutive sessions. Participants were divided into three groups, with a different starting time of the sequence of the three sessions across groups (morning or afternoon or evening) to examine the effect of diurnal variation (time of day that the tasks were performed) separated from the effect of session repetition (practice effect). The results showed no effect of diurnal variation for all indexes of saccadic eye movement performance including accuracy (antisaccade and countermanding saccade tasks) speed (mean latency in all tasks) and stability (intra-subject standard deviation of latency in all tasks). In contrast, saccadic task repetition significantly improved accuracy, speed and stability of performance indicating the presence of practice effects in these tasks. Finally, linear mixed model analysis confirmed no interaction between diurnal variation and practice effects for all indexes of saccadic eye movement performance. In conclusion our study provides confirmation that saccadic task performance is not affected by diurnal variation related to circadian rhythms. In contrast, short term repetition of these tasks results in significant practice effects.

Figures