Multistakeholder scientific advice for medicinal products used in combination with a medical device or a companion diagnostic in the EU—summary of a Focus group discussion
Stiina Aarum, Claudia Popp, Alexa Hunter, Miha Skvarc, Ilona Reischl, Hilke Zander, Joerg Zinserling, Petra van Leeuwen, Jonathan Sutch, Tim Chesworth, Elisabeth Kapeller, Andreas Emmendoerffer, Iordanis Gravanis, Christelle Bouygues, Claudia Vincenzi, Michael Berntgen

TL;DR
This paper discusses the challenges of developing medicines used with medical devices in the EU and proposes a multistakeholder platform to improve regulatory advice.
Contribution
The paper introduces a focus group discussion aimed at establishing a multistakeholder platform for scientific advice on drug-device and drug-IVD combinations.
Findings
Nine study cases were discussed, covering drug-device and drug-IVD combinations.
The focus group identified the need for a multistakeholder platform to address scientific questions in evidence generation planning.
High-risk and low-risk stand-alone devices were excluded from the discussion scope.
Abstract
Although there is growing use of medicinal products in combination with medical devices, including in vitro diagnostics (IVDs) and software as a medical device, their development in the EU is proving to be more challenging due to the complexities in working across the regulatory frameworks for medicinal products, medical devices and IVDs. One of the concerns is the lack of a multistakeholder platform [European Medicines Agency (EMA)/Scientific Advice Working Party (SAWP); National Competent Authorities (NCAs) in charge of medicinal products; NCAs for medical devices; notified bodies (NBs)] for scientific and regulatory advice on medicinal products used in combination with medical devices or IVDs [including companion diagnostics (CDx)]. A multistakeholder platform would allow for an opportunity to discuss the scientific expectations of the different decision makers involved and guide the…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsScience, Research, and Medicine · Biomedical Ethics and Regulation · Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
