Gender differences in the Italian academic landscape: Examining inequalities within the medical area in the last decade
Roberta Magnano San Lio, Mara Morini, Enrico Di Rosa, Alessandra Sinopoli, Virginia Casigliani, Manuela Martella, Andrea Maugeri, Martina Barchitta, Maria Carmela Agodi, Ilenia Picardi, Antonella Agodi, Claudia González Brambila, Claudia González Brambila

TL;DR
This study shows that while women dominate early academic roles in Italian medical sciences, men hold most senior positions, highlighting ongoing gender inequality.
Contribution
The paper provides a decade-long analysis of gender disparities in Italy's Medical Sciences sector using the Glass Ceiling and Glass Door Indices.
Findings
Women make up 71.5% of research fellows but only 28.2% of full professors in the Medical Sciences sector.
Gender inequality persists across all regions, with a Glass Ceiling Index above one from 2015 to 2023.
The Glass Door Index indicates worsening disparities in career progression for women by 2023.
Abstract
Gender equality remains a key focus in research and innovation policies. However, the academic sector still exhibits significant under-representation of women in leadership roles and horizontal segregation affecting career trajectories. This study examines gender inequalities in top positions and career progression within Italy’s Medical Sciences sector (Area 06) from 2014 to 2023, through data from the Cineca portal, including details on academic roles, gender, region, and scientific-disciplinary sectors (SSDs). Gender disparity was evaluated using the Glass Ceiling Index (GCI) and the Glass Door Index (GDI). Data analysis up to 2023 shows a gender inversion in career progression: women dominate early career stages – accounted for 71.5% of research fellows and 57.1% of RTDA positions –, but men prevail in senior roles, with 61.8% associate professors and 71.8% full professors. This…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsDiversity and Career in Medicine · Health and Medical Research Impacts · Sex and Gender in Healthcare
