# Efficacy and Safety of Nifedipine Compared to Intravenous Hydralazine for Severe Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randmomized Controlled Trials

**Authors:** Vaisnavy Govindasamy, Mohammed Amer Kamel, Gabriele Volucke, Aashir Javed, Upayan Palchaudhuri, Sayed Irfan Kazi, Ahmad Albanna, Mays Akileh, Rohit Mukherjee, Rabia Nusrat, Tayyaba Qaiser, Eman Ibrahim Elzain Hassan, Muhammad Muneeb Azhar, Tallal Mushtaq Hashmi, Mushood Ahmed, Ali Hasan, Raheel Ahmed

PMC · DOI: 10.3390/medsci13030091 · 2025-07-13

## TL;DR

This study compares nifedipine and hydralazine for treating severe hypertension in pregnancy and finds both drugs equally effective, but nifedipine causes fewer side effects.

## Contribution

A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the safety and efficacy of nifedipine and hydralazine in managing severe hypertensive disorders in pregnancy.

## Key findings

- Nifedipine and hydralazine showed similar effectiveness in controlling blood pressure and maternal/neonatal outcomes.
- Nifedipine was associated with significantly fewer maternal adverse events compared to hydralazine.
- No significant differences were found in caesarean delivery rates, neonatal birth weight, or NICU admissions between the two drugs.

## Abstract

Background: Severe maternal hypertension is linked to adverse perinatal outcomes. Both nifedipine and hydralazine are commonly used antihypertensive agents in this setting. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE from inception to April 2024 to identify randomized controlled trials comparing oral or sublingual nifedipine with intravenous hydralazine for the management of severe hypertension, with or without preeclampsia/eclampsia. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed using RevMan. Results: Seven randomized controlled trials were included. The pooled analysis demonstrated no significant difference between the two agents regarding time to achieve optimal blood pressure control (MD = −1.08 min, 95% CI = −6.66 to 4.49), caesarean delivery (OR = 0.62, 95% CI = 0.38 to 1.03), neonatal birth weight (MD = 57.65 g, 95% CI = −209.09 to −324.40), NICU admissions (OR = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.41 to 1.98), and 5-min APGAR scores (MD = 0.1, 95% CI = −0.20 to 0.39). However, patients receiving nifedipine had significantly lower odds of experiencing medication-related adverse events (OR = 0.62, 95% CI = 0.40 to 0.97). Conclusions: Nifedipine and intravenous hydralazine showed comparable efficacy in achieving optimal blood pressure control and similar maternal and neonatal outcomes. However, nifedipine was associated with significantly fewer maternal adverse effects, indicating superior tolerability.

## Linked entities

- **Chemicals:** nifedipine (PubChem CID 4485), hydralazine (PubChem CID 3637)
- **Diseases:** preeclampsia (MONDO:0005081), eclampsia (MONDO:0001754)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** preeclampsia (MESH:D011225), Hypertensive Disorders (MESH:D006973), eclampsia (MESH:D004461)
- **Chemicals:** Hydralazine (MESH:D006830), Nifedipine (MESH:D009543)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Figures

3 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12286209/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12286209