Assessment of seven feed additives consisting of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum ATCC 55943, DSM 18112, DSM 18113, DSM 18114 and ATCC 55944, Lentilactobacillus buchneri ATCC PTA‐2494 and ATCC PTA‐6138, for all animal species (Pioneer Hi‐Bred International, Inc.)
Roberto Edoardo Villa, Giovanna Azimonti, Eleftherios Bonos, Henrik Christensen, Mojca Durjava, Birgit Dusemund, Ronette Gehring, Boet Glandorf, Maryline Kouba, Marta López‐Alonso, Francesca Marcon, Carlo Nebbia, Alena Pechová, Miguel Prieto‐Maradona, Ilen Röhe

TL;DR
This paper evaluates seven feed additives containing specific bacteria for use in animal feed, confirming their safety after new data was provided.
Contribution
The study provides a safety assessment of seven bacterial feed additives for all animal species using newly submitted data.
Findings
The FEEDAP Panel concluded the safety of the additives after reviewing new data.
The additives were previously uncharacterized due to lack of data on contamination and impurities.
The new data allowed full characterization and safety evaluation of the products.
Abstract
Following a request from the European Commission, EFSA was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the assessment of the follow‐up applications for renewal of seven technological additives, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum ATCC 55943, L. plantarum DSM 18112, L. plantarum DSM 18113, L. plantarum DSM 18114, L. plantarum ATCC 55944, Lentilactobacillus buchneri ATCC PTA‐2494, L. buchneri ATCC PTA‐ 6138, as silage additives for all animal species. The additives are currently authorised. In the previous opinions, the FEEDAP Panel could not conclude on the full characterisation of the additives under assessment due to absence of data regarding the microbiological contamination and impurities. The applicant provided new data, which allowed the Panel to conclude on the characterisation of the products, and thereby its safety.
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAgricultural safety and regulations · Pesticide Residue Analysis and Safety · Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
