# Short- and long-term impact of aseptic bathing strategies on the skin microbiome in ICU patients

**Authors:** Tilman E. Klassert, Cristina Zubiria-Barrera, Luisa A. Denkel, Mercedes Lopez, Robert Neubert, Amelya Keles Slevogt, Frank Bloos, P. Christian Schulze, Jörg Epstude, Petra Gastmeier, Christine Geffers, Hortense Slevogt

PMC · DOI: 10.1007/s00430-025-00843-1 · 2025-07-22

## TL;DR

This study examines how antiseptic bathing affects the skin microbiome of ICU patients over time, finding no significant changes in microbial structure or antibiotic resistance.

## Contribution

The study provides longitudinal evidence on the impact of antiseptic bathing on ICU patients' skin microbiome and antibiotic resistance.

## Key findings

- Chlorhexidine bathing reduced bacterial biomass without altering microbial diversity or composition.
- Antiseptic strategies did not increase antibiotic resistance gene accumulation on skin sites.
- Loss of microbiome site-specificity persisted regardless of the bathing strategy used.

## Abstract

Bathing strategies with antiseptic agents, such as Chlorhexidine and Octenidine, have been widely adopted to mitigate infection risks in intensive care units (ICU). However, concerns exist regarding their long-term effects on skin microbiome structures and potential unintended consequences, including antibiotic cross-resistance. This longitudinal study characterized the compositional changes of the skin microbiome of ICU patients upon these two antiseptic bathing strategies when compared to standard water and soap bathing. Samples were collected in a three-armed cluster randomized decolonization trial (registration number DRKS00010475). Skin swabs from 5 different sites and three time points were analyzed by culture-based methods, 16S rRNA-gene amplicon sequencing and multiplex Taq-Man assays for detection of antimicrobial resistance genes (ARG). Our results show that Chlorhexidine bathing led to a sustained reduction of the bacterial biomass on different skin sites, as measured by both molecular and culture-based methods. Thereby, the microbial structures remained largely unaltered both in their diversity and their taxonomic composition. However, the loss of microbiome site-specificity observed on the skin of ICU patients remained unchanged independently from the bathing strategy applied and persisted even after discharge. None of the antiseptic bathing strategies led to an increase or accumulation of antibiotic-resistance determinants on any of the skin sites investigated in this study. Thus, this study suggests that daily patient bathing with 2% Chlorhexidine impregnated cloths or 0.08% Octenidine wash mitts does not impact skin microbiome structures and antibiotic resistance gene accumulation in ICU patients when compared to non-antiseptic water and soap bathing routine.

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00430-025-00843-1.

## Linked entities

- **Chemicals:** Chlorhexidine (PubChem CID 9552079), Octenidine (PubChem CID 51167)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** infection (MESH:D007239)
- **Chemicals:** Chlorhexidine (MESH:D002710), Octenidine (MESH:C034213)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Figures

4 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12283771/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12283771