In vitro model assesses the susceptibility of polymeric scaffolds for material-driven heart valve regeneration to calcification
Dewy C. van der Valk, Charlotte M. Hoes, Yunia M. H. Rasenberg, Paul A. A. Bartels, Livia Angeloni, Bente J. de Kort, Paul J. F. M. Janssen, Frank P. T. Baaijens, Anthal I. P. M. Smits, Carlijn V. C. Bouten

TL;DR
Researchers developed an in vitro model to test how likely heart valve scaffolds are to calcify, which could improve the design of biodegradable materials for tissue engineering.
Contribution
The study introduces a novel in vitro model to assess calcification risk in polymeric scaffolds for heart valve tissue engineering.
Findings
TE scaffolds showed significantly less calcification than bovine pericardial patches.
Cyclic strain did not influence calcification in the tested materials.
The model effectively mimics calcification and supports systematic material testing.
Abstract
Material driven in situ heart valve tissue engineering (HVTE) prospects an alternative to non-living replacements. HVTE exploits bioresorbable (synthetic) scaffolds that guide neo-tissue formation. Proper scaffold design assesses and mitigates potential material-related risks, such as calcific nodule formation. Herein, we establish an in vitro model to investigate the calcification risk of materials for HVTE. Calcification was studied by culturing 3D scaffolds with porcine valvular interstitial cells in a phosphate-enhanced calcification medium (CM) for 3 weeks. The model was applied by testing three electrospun polymeric Tissue engineering (TE) scaffolds (PCL, PCL-BU, and PC-BU) against a bovine pericardial patch control. Additionally, the model included a 10% cyclic strain environment to evaluate hemodynamic effects. TE constructs showed significantly less calcification compared to…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments · Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty · Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management
