# Collaborative decision-making for localized emergency response in major railroad projects

## TL;DR

The paper explores how local governments, businesses, and the public can work together to improve emergency responses during major railroad projects.

## Contribution

A novel tripartite decision-making framework using an asymmetric evolutionary game model and dynamic simulation is proposed.

## Key findings

- Prioritizing public engagement leads to a stable equilibrium in emergency response strategies.
- Government subsidies significantly influence strategic choices of all agents.
- Collaboration and public participation enhance response efficiency and resource allocation.

## Abstract

This paper examines major railroad projects’ emergency response decision-making process, focusing on timeliness, cost-effectiveness, and public involvement. It explores the optimal collaborative strategies of local governments, enterprises, and the public during the construction phase. A novel tripartite decision-making framework is proposed, based on an asymmetric evolutionary game model and dynamic simulation methods. The results show a stable equilibrium in emergency response strategies emerges when public engagement is prioritized. Government subsidy policies are found to significantly influence the strategic choices of all agents, emphasizing the critical role of coordinated collaboration. The study highlights the importance of public participation and multi-agent cooperation in addressing complex emergency challenges. These findings provide valuable guidance for improving localized emergency response strategies, enhancing collaborative decision-making, optimizing resource allocation, increasing response efficiency, and supporting policy formulation in major railroad projects.