# Responses to criticisms

## TL;DR

The paper defends the use of Evidential Pluralism in social sciences against recent criticisms.

## Contribution

It provides a rebuttal to critiques from Rosa Runhardt, Erik Weber, and Michael Wilde.

## Key findings

- Evidential Pluralism remains a valid approach for social science research.
- The authors clarify misunderstandings in the critics' interpretations.
- They reaffirm the framework's relevance and flexibility in diverse social contexts.

## Abstract

Responding to the critical commentaries by Rosa Runhardt, Erik Weber, and Michael Wilde, we defend the application of Evidential Pluralism to the social sciences.