# The Act of Measurement: The Influence of Behavioural Tests on Spider Fear and Disgust

**Authors:** Jacqueline Peters, Anne van Wonderen, Renée M. Visser, Merel Kindt

PMC · DOI: 10.1007/s10862-025-10234-8 · Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment · 2025-07-21

## TL;DR

This study shows that performing behavioral tests can reduce self-reported fear of spiders, especially in people with low fear levels, but not disgust.

## Contribution

The study reveals that behavioral assessments can influence spider fear, highlighting their potential impact on emotional states during translational research.

## Key findings

- Self-reported fear decreased after behavioral tasks, but disgust did not.
- Low-fear individuals showed reduced fear, while high-fear individuals remained unaffected.
- Fear reduction was not observed on exploratory questionnaires.

## Abstract

Behavioural assessments offer clinically relevant insights into anxious symptomatology, complementing self-report questionnaires in monitoring treatment effects. However, as a behavioural test is a form of brief exposure, it might not solely measure distress, but also influence it. In this study, we investigated whether measuring spider avoidance behaviour changes spider-related distress. Seventy-five individuals with a broad range of spider fear provided self-reported fear and disgust ratings, using the Spider Distress Scale, before and after engaging in a tarantula and in a house spider behavioural approach task (BAT). We found that self-reported fear, but not disgust, decreased after engaging in the behavioural assessments. A subsequent exploration within low- and high-fear subgroups showed that this pattern was driven by low-fear individuals, as in high-fear individuals spider fear and disgust remained unaffected by the behavioural assessments. Spider fear did not decrease on two exploratory questionnaires. In principle, these findings are promising for the validity of behavioural assessments in translational research where sub-clinical samples are typically targeted. However, they emphasise the need to carefully translate laboratory findings to (sub-)clinical populations, not only due to varying fear levels, but also because behavioural assessments may be experienced differently in the context of a treatment study.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** Spider (MESH:D013684), Distress (MESH:D012128), fear (MESH:C000719212), spider fear (MESH:C000719193), Anxiety (MESH:D001007), phobias (MESH:D010698), specific phobias (MESH:C562465), anxiety disorders (MESH:D001008)
- **Chemicals:** SDS (-)
- **Species:** Araneae (spiders, order) [taxon 6893], Parasteatoda tepidariorum (common house spider, species) [taxon 114398], Eratigena atrica (species) [taxon 1698855], Grammostola porteri (species) [taxon 1749325], Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12279566/full.md

## Figures

2 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12279566/full.md

## References

40 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12279566/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12279566