Safety and feasibility of D3 lymph node dissection in oldest-old patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery: a multi-institutional, retrospective analysis
R. Inada, F. Teraishi, T. Mitsuhashi, S. Takanaga, T. Toshima, T. Ohtani, R. Yoshida, N. Hori, K. Shigemitsu, S. Yamamoto, T. Kubota, Y. Okano, T. Nobuhisa, F. Taniguchi, W. Ishikawa, R. Shoji, T. Matsuda, T. Umeoka, T. Fujiwara

TL;DR
This study shows that extensive lymph node dissection is safe for patients aged 90+ undergoing colorectal cancer surgery without increasing complications or hospital stays.
Contribution
The study provides the first multi-institutional evidence on the safety of D3 lymph node dissection in the oldest-old CRC population.
Findings
D3 LND resulted in significantly higher lymph node harvests for both Stage II and III patients.
No significant differences in postoperative complications were found between D3 and non-D3 groups.
Hospital stays were shorter for Stage III patients undergoing D3 LND.
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a significant health burden, with lymph node dissection (LND) playing a critical role in staging and guiding treatment. However, the optimal extent of LND for the oldest-old population (aged ≥ 90 years) remains undefined because of insufficient targeted clinical data. This study aimed to compare the short-term outcomes of D3 versus non-D3 LND in Stage II–III CRC in oldest-old patients. This retrospective cohort study utilized data from the Setouchi Colorectal Neoplasm Registration database, including 282 oldest-old patients with CRC treated between 2011 and 2022. Patients were stratified into D3 and non-D3 LND groups, with inverse-probability-weighted regression adjustment implemented to address potential confounding factors. Postoperative complications and hospital stays were analyzed using regression models and descriptive statistics. D3 LND resulted in…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsColorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments · Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection · Colorectal and Anal Carcinomas
