# Development of START-EDI guidelines for reporting equality, diversity and inclusion in research: a study protocol

**Authors:** Michael G Fadel, Hannah Kettley-Linsell, Piers R Boshier, Rebecca Barnes, Christopher Newby, Anthony Muchai Manyara, Peter Buckle, Darshali A Vyas, Julie Hepburn, Philip Edgar-Jones, Tanvi Rai, Brian D Nicholson, Amanda J Cross, Linda D Sharples, Sally Hopewell, Jérémie F Cohen, Vivian Welch, Patrick MM Bossuyt, George B Hanna

PMC · DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-095778 · BMJ Open · 2025-07-16

## TL;DR

This paper outlines the development of START-EDI guidelines to improve reporting of equality, diversity, and inclusion in research, aiming to reduce bias and increase transparency.

## Contribution

The novel contribution is the creation of standardized reporting guidelines for EDI in research through a structured, consensus-driven process.

## Key findings

- START-EDI guidelines will be developed through a five-stage process involving diverse stakeholders and consensus methods.
- The guidelines aim to improve consistency and transparency in EDI reporting across research fields.
- The project includes ethical approval and plans for open dissemination through peer-reviewed publications and conferences.

## Abstract

Acknowledging equality, diversity and inclusion (EDI) in research is not only a moral imperative but also an important step in avoiding bias and ensuring generalisability of results. This protocol describes the development of STAndards for ReporTing EDI (START-EDI) in research, which will provide a set of minimum standards to help researchers improve their consistency, completeness and transparency in EDI reporting. We anticipate that these guidelines will benefit authors, reviewers, editors, funding organisations, healthcare providers, patients and the public.

To create START-EDI reporting guidelines, the following five stages are proposed: (i) establish a diverse, multidisciplinary Steering Committee that will lead and coordinate guideline development; (ii) a systematic review to identify the essential principles and methodological approaches for EDI to generate preliminary checklist items; (iii) conduct an international Delphi process to reach a consensus on the checklist items; (iv) finalise the reporting guidelines and create a separate explanation and elaboration document; and (v) broad dissemination and implementation of START-EDI guidelines. We will work with patient and public involvement representatives and under-served groups in research throughout the project stages.

The study has received ethical approval from the Imperial College London Research Ethics Committee (study ID: 7592283). The reporting guidelines will be published in open access peer-reviewed publications and presented in international conferences, and disseminated through community networks and forums.

The project is pre-registered within the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/8udbq/) and the Enhancing the Quality and Transparency of Health Research Network.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** START (MESH:D020922)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12273130/full.md

## Figures

2 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12273130/full.md

## References

65 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12273130/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12273130