Corrigendum to “The Distal Free Achilles Tendon Is Longer in People with Tendinopathy than in Controls: A Retrospective Case-Control Study”
Abstract
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsTendon Structure and Treatment · Shoulder Injury and Treatment
J. H. Callow, M. Cresswell, F. Damji, J. Seto, A. J. Hodgson, and A. Scott, “The Distal Free Achilles Tendon Is Longer in People with Tendinopathy than in Controls: A Retrospective Case-Control Study,” Translational Sports Medicine 2022, no. 1 (2022): 1–9, https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/6585980.
In the article, the authors have identified errors in the abstract and Section 3.1.
In the abstract section:
“MRI-defined free Achilles tendon length is a statistically significant predictor of having midportion Achilles tendinopathy (odds ratio = 0.53, 95% confidence interval 1.13–2.07).”
Should read:
“MRI-defined free Achilles tendon length is a statistically significant predictor of having midportion Achilles tendinopathy (odds ratio = 1.53, 95% confidence interval 1.13–2.07).”
In Section 3.1:
“All others held constant, every 1 cm increase in length was associated with 1.53 higher odds of having Achilles tendinopathy using model A (95% confidence interval 1.13 to 2.07, p=0.006) and 1.64 higher odds using model B (95% confidence interval 1.13 to 3.15, p=0.015).”
Should read:
“All others held constant, every 1 cm increase in length was associated with 1.53 higher odds of having Achilles tendinopathy using model A (95% confidence interval 1.13 to 2.07, p=0.006) and 1.89 higher odds using model B (95% confidence interval 1.13 to 3.15, p=0.015).”
We apologize for this error.