# The costs and benefits of deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease: a review and social network analysis

**Authors:** Carlos Zúñiga-Ramírez, Katia Carmina Farías-Moreno, Gabriel Moreno, Enrique Gómez-Figueroa, Hernando Efraín Caicedo-Ortíz, José Damián Carrillo-Ruíz

PMC · DOI: 10.1055/s-0045-1809996 · Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria · 2025-07-17

## TL;DR

This paper reviews the costs and benefits of deep brain stimulation versus medication for Parkinson's disease, finding that surgery becomes cost-effective over time.

## Contribution

The study provides a comprehensive review and social network analysis of economic evaluations comparing deep brain stimulation and pharmacological treatments for Parkinson's disease.

## Key findings

- DBS has higher initial costs but becomes cost-effective within five years.
- Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios varied widely across studies.
- Most studies were from Europe, indicating regional focus in economic evaluations.

## Abstract

Parkinson's disease (PD) is the second most prevalent neurodegenerative disorder worldwide. Levodopa has been considered the best treatment option. However, deep brain stimulation (DBS) use has increased over time, mostly when levodopa-related complications arise.

To review the current evidence regarding economic evaluations assessing costs and benefits comparing pharmacological versus surgical treatment among subjects with PD.

We searched three databases (PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar) for studies comparing levodopa treatment and DBS among subjects with PD in terms of costs and benefits from therapy.

Out of the 107 studies identified, 14 met the inclusion criteria. Most of the published studies were from Europe. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios have shown variable results, from -€979 to €6,729 per change of 1 point in the score on part III of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS III), while incremental cost-utility ratios depict values as low as €6,700 and as high as $704,906.03 per quality-adjusted life-years (QALY).

We observed a higher cost during the 1
st
year of DBS implantation due to the surgical procedure itself, subsequently, there was a trend for a lower cost over the following years, with no loss of benefit. Overall, the studies showed DBS as a cost-effective measure at 5-years after implantation.

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** Parkinson's disease (MONDO:0005180)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** neurodegenerative disorder (MESH:D019636), PD (MESH:D010300)
- **Chemicals:** Levodopa (MESH:D007980)

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12270636/full.md

## Figures

3 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12270636/full.md

## References

36 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12270636/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12270636