Correction: Exciton dynamics from the mapping approach to surface hopping: comparison with Förster and Redfield theories
Johan E. Runeson, Thomas P. Fay, David E. Manolopoulos
TL;DR
This paper corrects a previous study on exciton dynamics and their comparison with Förster and Redfield theories.
Contribution
The paper provides corrections to prior calculations and interpretations in exciton dynamics modeling.
Findings
Errors in the original paper's calculations were identified and corrected.
The revised analysis improves the accuracy of comparing surface hopping with Förster and Redfield theories.
Abstract
Correction for ‘Exciton dynamics from the mapping approach to surface hopping: comparison with Förster and Redfield theories’ by Johan E. Runeson et al., Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2024, 26, 4929–4938, https://doi.org/10.1039/D3CP05926J.
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1- —Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung10.13039/501100001711
- —U.S. Department of Energy10.13039/100000015
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMolecular Junctions and Nanostructures · Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies · Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties
The authors regret that Fig. 3 in the original article was incorrect as the right panel showed results from a different initial condition. The correct figure is shown here. The original figure caption and the text remain correct.
The Royal Society of Chemistry apologises for these errors and any consequent inconvenience to authors and readers.