Detailed Association Between Pulmonary Vein Isolation and Cardiovascular Reflex
Naoya Kataoka, Teruhiko Imamura

Abstract
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders · Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control · Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
To Editor,
The authors demonstrated that pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) did not impair cardiovascular reflexes involving afferent baroreceptors [1]. While the findings are noteworthy, several concerns arise.
A previous study reported that ablation of the left atrial ganglionated plexi suppressed the recurrence of vasovagal syncope, likely due not only to the maintenance of heart rate through disruption of efferent fibers but also to the suppression of the Bezold–Jarisch reflex through disruption of afferent fibers [2]. How do the authors account for the discrepancy between that study and their own? One possible explanation is that the area of nerve fiber disruption caused by PVI is more limited compared to that of ganglionated plexi ablation. Additionally, the present study focused solely on volume‐sensitive reflexes [1], whereas the previous study evaluated broader clinical outcomes, including heart rate responses and syncope events [2].
More than half of the participants in the present study were receiving beta‐blockers [1], which may influence cardiac autonomic regulation. How do the authors consider the potential impact of beta‐blockers on their findings?
Last, the anatomical basis for the preservation of afferent fibers after PVI remains unclear [3]. Since PVI primarily targets the endocardium of the left atrium, it is possible that afferent fibers are predominantly located in the epicardium. Alternatively, afferent pathways may primarily reside outside the left atrium, such as in the left ventricle.
Ethics Statement
The authors have nothing to report.
Consent
The authors have nothing to report.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Linked Articles
Malik V, Elliott AD, Thomas G et al., “Pulmonary Vein Isolation Does Not Alter Cardiovascular Afferent Autonomic Reflexes in Atrial Fibrillation,” Journal of Arrhythmia 41 (2025): e70119, https://doi.org/10.1002/joa3.70119.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1V. Malik , A. D. Elliott , G. Thomas , et al., “Pulmonary Vein Isolation Does Not Alter Cardiovascular Afferent Autonomic Reflexes in Atrial Fibrillation,” Journal of Arrhythmia 41 (2025): e 70119, 10.1002/joa 3.70119.40556768 PMC 12185909 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 2W. Sun , L. Zheng , Y. Qiao , et al., “Catheter Ablation as a Treatment for Vasovagal Syncope: Long‐Term Outcome of Endocardial Autonomic Modification of the Left Atrium,” Journal of the American Heart Association 5 (2016): 5, 10.1161/jaha.116.003471.PMC 501538327402231 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 3A. H. G. Driessen , W. R. Berger , S. P. J. Krul , et al., “Ganglion Plexus Ablation in Advanced Atrial Fibrillation: The AFACT Study,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology 68 (2016): 1155–1165, 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.06.036.27609676 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
