# The effect of whole-body electromyostimulation on metabolic syndrome in affected adults: A subanalysis of a randomized controlled trial

## TL;DR

This study examines whether whole-body electromyostimulation improves metabolic syndrome in overweight adults with knee osteoarthritis.

## Contribution

The study evaluates the effectiveness of whole-body electromyostimulation on metabolic syndrome in a specific patient group.

## Key findings

- WB-EMS showed a moderate but non-significant improvement in the MetS-Z score.
- No significant changes were observed in metabolic syndrome components.
- WB-EMS was well-tolerated and had no adverse effects.

## Abstract

Many people with osteoarthritis of the knee suffer from overweight, obesity, and cardiometabolic conditions. In the present subanalysis of a randomized controlled trial of the effect of whole-body electromyostimulation (WB-EMS) on knee osteoarthritis in overweight Caucasians, we focus on participants with Metabolic Syndrome (MetS). Based on previous research, we hypothesized that WB-EMS significantly improves the Metabolic Syndrome Z score (MetS-Z score) compared with non-training controls. Thirty-two of the initial 72 overweight adults (58 ± 6 years, body mass index: 31 ± 4 kg/m2) with knee osteoarthritis, randomly allocated to a 29-week standard WB-EMS application or to a non-exercising control group (CG) and suffering from MetS, were included. The primary outcome was the MetS-Z score, based on the criteria of the International Diabetes Federation. Secondary outcomes were MetS components, i.e., waist circumference, mean arterial blood pressure, fasting glucose, triglycerides, and HDL-cholesterol. Based on the intention-to-treat principle, analysis of covariance determines differences between the groups (i.e., “effects”). In total, three participants were lost to 29-week follow-up. The attendance rate averaged 89% ± 9% in the WB-EMS group. Adverse effects related to the intervention were not observed. WB-EMS (n = 17) induced a non-significant, medium-size effect (p = 0.061; η2 = 0.13) on the MetS-Z score compared with non-exercise CG (n = 15). In addition, no significant effects (p ≥ 0.146) were observed for MetS components. In the present study, we observed a moderate, although non-significant effect on the MetS-Z score. Given that the WB-EMS application was well-tolerated and accepted by the participants, we conclude that this exercise technology may offer (limited) benefits for MetS treatment. Nevertheless, further studies should address this issue with higher statistical power.