Evaluating the Anticholinergic Burden (ACB) of Patients Referred to Rotherham Memory Clinic
Nkiruka Onyekwelu

TL;DR
This study found that only 10% of patients referred to a memory clinic had their anticholinergic burden scores documented, and many were on high-risk medications.
Contribution
The study highlights the underutilization of anticholinergic burden documentation in clinical practice and suggests the need for standardized scoring systems.
Findings
Only 3 out of 30 analyzed patients had documented ACB scores.
43% of patients had an ACB score of ≥2 using the ACB calculator.
Amitriptyline was the most common medication contributing to high ACB scores.
Abstract
Aims: To evaluate if documentation of Anticholinergic burden (ACB) score is in accordance with the NICE guidelines. To calculate the Anticholinergic burden (ACB) score for patients referred to memory clinic if not documented. Methods: I conducted retrospective analysis using a systematic sampling method and a proforma on patient’s electronic medical record to ascertain if the ACBs of patients were documented when being reviewed. Information was obtained from both SystmOne tabbed journals, SystmOne medications list, and referral letters (to determine ACB score documentation and calculation). Two scoring systems were used to calculate ACB: ACB calculator (https://www.acbcalc.com/) and POMH data collection tool. Results: Of the 92 patients referred to memory service, 30 patients were analysed and only 3 had documented ACB burden score (10%). Using the ACB scale. 13 individuals had ACB…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes · Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
