P01 IV antimicrobial review…who #CARES?
K Atack, S Hackney, L Nguyen, Z Tariq, S Nazir, S Catt, T Wolf, E O’Cofaigh

TL;DR
This paper describes a new digital method for tracking IV antimicrobial reviews using #CARES tags to improve data collection and antimicrobial stewardship.
Contribution
A novel digital system using #CARES tags was implemented to automate and improve IV antimicrobial review tracking.
Findings
By January 2025, 9% of IV antibiotics had #CARES documented across the trust.
Specialty and Integrated Medicine had the highest #CARES documentation at 23.97%.
Some departments, like Leeds Childrens Hospital, had no #CARES documentation in January 2025.
Abstract
IV antimicrobial review is a marker of antimicrobial stewardship, and national guidance from the UK Health & Security Agency (UKHSA) stipulates trusts should be aware of their performance to drive improvement. LTHT previously counted IV antimicrobial reviews via the clinical review function on the electronic drug chart (eMeds), relying on clinicians to manually complete this, with less than 10% achieved monthly. A pharmacist-led audit in March 2024, showed that 81% of IV antibiotics had a 48 h review documented, however collecting this data was very labour intensive and not repeatable on a monthly basis. The Pharmacy Infection Team worked with the Information & Insight digital team to develop a process where clinicians can write #CARES #decision based on the outcome of their review in the patient’s electronic notes and data is digitally, automatically counted. The CARES acronym is from…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAntibiotic Use and Resistance
