# Ureteral Occlusion: Device Strategies, Approaches, and Results

**Authors:** Benjamin Treutler, Sahana Kumar, Christopher Shallal, Aryaman Gupta, Sanjana Kumar, Nicholas Zhang, Sean Healy, Jayaram Mandavilli, Nehali Gupta, Elizabeth A. Logsdon, Jordan Shuff, E. James Wright, Clifford R. Weiss

PMC · DOI: 10.1155/aiu/7843401 · Advances in Urology · 2025-07-02

## TL;DR

This paper reviews devices used to block urine flow temporarily to help heal urinary tract injuries, aiming to reduce the need for additional surgeries.

## Contribution

The paper evaluates the effectiveness of various ureteral occlusion devices and proposes metrics for selecting optimal devices for wound healing.

## Key findings

- Successful devices must fully block urine flow and resist migration.
- Detachable balloons, platinum coils, and ureteral clips are among the more effective devices.
- Current devices often fail to maintain sufficient dryness for optimal healing.

## Abstract

Genitourinary tract injuries can occur in the urinary tract or reproductive system as a result of trauma-related pelvic fractures, iatrogenic lacerations or ligations, and radiation therapy for reproductive or digestive malignancies. Although surgical reintervention is possible for large urinary tract injuries, a key component for healing smaller injuries is the ability to divert urine from the injury site to prevent urine-wound contact. This enables the injury to heal prior to reintervention and can eliminate the need for a secondary procedure, reducing the potential for complications. This type of urinary diversion is required by 140,000 patients in the United States annually, leading to the development of several devices to divert urine. The current standard of care includes minimally invasive procedures, such as placement of a catheter, double-J stent, or nephroureteral stent, but such measures often do not maintain sufficient dryness to enable wound healing. Based on a review of the literature, we have determined that successful devices need to prevent 100% of the anterograde urine flow, resist migration down the ureter because of peristalsis, and prevent urothelium growth over the device to promote wound healing without causing complications or necessitating reintervention. We also evaluated these devices according to the robustness of the study populations and designs in which they are reported. Some of the more successful devices include detachable, semicompliant balloons, platinum coils, and ureteral clips. Here, we present a narrative review of temporary and permanent ureteral occlusion devices and evaluate their potential for supporting wound healing. We also explore metrics by which to compare and select appropriate devices for urinary diversion.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** Genitourinary tract injuries (MESH:C564424), Ureteral Occlusion (MESH:D014515), digestive malignancies (MESH:D004828), pelvic fractures (MESH:D034161), urinary tract injuries (MESH:D014570), trauma (MESH:D014947)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12255495/full.md

## Figures

3 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12255495/full.md

## References

41 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12255495/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12255495