# Oncologist and General Practitioner Perspectives of Shared Care for Colorectal Cancer Survivors: A Qualitative Study

**Authors:** Karolina Lisy, Matthew Tieu, Claire Gore, Penelope Schofield, Raymond J. Chan, Jon Emery, Andrew Martin, Richard De Abreu Lourenco, Michael Jefford

PMC · DOI: 10.1002/pon.70223 · Psycho-Oncology · 2025-07-12

## TL;DR

This study explores how oncologists and GPs view shared care for colorectal cancer survivors, identifying key factors for successful implementation.

## Contribution

Provides new insights into the practical challenges and facilitators of shared care from the perspectives of healthcare professionals.

## Key findings

- Shared care was broadly accepted by both GPs and oncologists.
- Bilateral communication and clear guidance for GPs were critical for successful implementation.
- Logistical support and care coordination were emphasized as necessary for shared care models.

## Abstract

There is a growing body of evidence to support shared survivorship care. The shared care of colorectal cancer survivors (SCORE) randomised controlled trial (RCT) demonstrated that shared care is an appropriate and cost‐effective model. Understanding the perspectives of oncologists and general practitioners (GPs) who participated in SCORE will provide crucial insights to support wider implementation of shared care and adoption into clinical practice.

To explore the experiences of oncologists and GPs who provided shared survivorship care for colorectal cancer survivors within the SCORE RCT, focussing on perceptions of acceptability and appropriateness of shared care, and facilitators and barriers to implementation.

This qualitative descriptive study utilised semi‐structured interviews for data collection. Interviews were recorded and transcribed, and data analysed by hybrid deductive/inductive thematic analysis.

Interviews from 20 HCPs (13 GPs and 7 oncologists) were analysed. Seven themes were developed describing overall acceptance of the shared care model, the importance and challenges regarding bilateral communication between providers, mixed views on the need for GP training, and patients suitable for shared care. The need to support GPs with a direct hospital‐based contact person, as well as clear guidance on their role, was emphasised, as was the need for care coordination and logistical support.

Our study offers novel findings regarding shared care from the perspective of participants who have direct experience with delivering the model. While shared care was broadly supported by both GPs and specialists, successful implementation requires agreed‐upon bilateral communication, clear guidance for GPs, and coordination support.

The Shared Care for Colorectal Cancer (SCORE) Trial is registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ACTRN12617000004369p. Registered on 3 January 2017; protocol version 4 approved 24 February 2017.

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** colorectal cancer (MONDO:0005575)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** Colorectal Cancer (MESH:D015179)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12255378/full.md

## References

38 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12255378/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12255378