# Knowledge and attitudes toward recreational cannabis legalization among California residents: a population-matched questionnaire about Proposition 64

**Authors:** Daniel Ageze, Sara Baird, Thomas D. Marcotte, Ahmed Elashmawy, Angela Wong, Renee Dell’Acqua, Jill Rybar, Sarah Hacker, Alice Gold, Tom Shaughnessy, Ilene Lanin-Kettering, Linda L. Hill

PMC · DOI: 10.1186/s42238-025-00304-9 · Journal of Cannabis Research · 2025-07-12

## TL;DR

This study examines how well California residents understand and feel about recreational cannabis legalization under Proposition 64, finding significant knowledge gaps and mixed attitudes.

## Contribution

The study provides new insights into public knowledge and attitudes toward cannabis legalization in California using a demographically matched population sample.

## Key findings

- Current cannabis users had high awareness of Prop 64 but low knowledge of specific regulations like possession and transportation limits.
- Current users showed more positive attitudes toward cannabis legalization than former and non-users.
- Only 30% of current users supported legalizing cannabis use in more public places.

## Abstract

Implemented in 2018, Proposition 64: The Adult Use of Marijuana Act (Prop 64; passed in 2016) legalized adult recreational cannabis use in California. This analysis of the Impact 64 study aimed to assess knowledge about Prop 64 and attitudes toward cannabis legalization by California residents.

A mixed qualitative and quantitative questionnaire about cannabis and Prop 64 was completed by 4,020 current cannabis users, 523 former users, and 635 non-users who were selected from an initial pool demographically matched to the 2020 California census. Quantitative questions about Prop 64 knowledge and attitudes were selected for this sub-analysis. Chi-squared tests and nominal logistic multivariate analysis were used to assess knowledge and attitudes based on demographic characteristics and cannabis use factors.

Current users had a mean age of 42 years and were 59% male, and more than 90% had heard of Prop 64. The 71% of current users who described themselves as somewhat or very familiar with Prop 64 were more likely to be employed full-time (AOR 1.5, p < 0.001), have no minors in the household (AOR 1.4, p < 0.001), and live in Central California (AOR 1.3, p < 0.001). Awareness of specific regulations of the associated laws was low among current users, including for possession (49%), transportation (41%), and gifting (30%) of cannabis, as well as for age and possession limits. Attitudes were mixed, though current users had more positive attitudes than former and non-users for almost all measures (p < 0.001). Only 30% of current cannabis users, believe cannabis should be legal to use in more public places, and only half of current users felt that Prop 64 made cannabis products and cannabis acquisition safer.

Four years after implementation, knowledge gaps around Prop 64 are widespread. Effective messaging is needed to increase awareness and bridge knowledge gaps, which can ultimately minimize public harm.

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s42238-025-00304-9.

## Full-text entities

- **Genes:** DCC (DCC netrin 1 receptor) [NCBI Gene 1630] {aka CRC18, CRCR1, HGPPS2, IGDCC1, MRMV1, NTN1R1}
- **Diseases:** lung and breathing problems (MESH:D008171)
- **Chemicals:** CBD (-), Alcohol (MESH:D000438), Delta 9 Tetrahydrocannabinol (MESH:D013759)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606], Nicotiana tabacum (American tobacco, species) [taxon 4097]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12254984/full.md

## References

10 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12254984/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12254984