# Examining Classic Bioimpedance Vector Patterns Between BMI Classifications Among Community-Dwelling Older Women

**Authors:** Kworweinski Lafontant, David H. Fukuda, Dea Chovatia, Cecil Latta, Chitra Banarjee, Jeffrey R. Stout, Rui Xie, Janet Lopez, Ladda Thiamwong

PMC · DOI: 10.3390/s25134181 · Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025-07-04

## TL;DR

This study shows that BMI categories among older women do not fully reflect individual body composition differences revealed by bioimpedance analysis.

## Contribution

The study reveals distinct bioimpedance vector patterns across BMI groups in older women, highlighting BMI's limitations in assessing individual cellular health.

## Key findings

- Body fat percentage and resistance/height differ significantly across BMI groups.
- Overweight and obese BMI categories cluster in the 'obese' quadrant in bioimpedance plots.
- Individuals within the same BMI category show varied bioimpedance patterns across health quadrants.

## Abstract

Body mass index (BMI) is not equipped to adequately detect obesity in individuals, leading to conditions such as normal-weight obesity, which disproportionately impact older women. Bioelectrical impedance vector analysis (BIVA) is a non-invasive and accessible method for assessing body composition and cellular health (e.g., resistance/height, reactance/height, phase angle), yet little is known about how BMI categories differ in cellular health. This cross-sectional study compared bioimpedance and adiposity across BMI classifications (normal weight, overweight, and obese) among 196 community-dwelling older women (age: 74.5 ± 7.0 years, BMI: 30.3 ± 6.3 kg/m2) using a one-way ANOVA and BIVA software. Individual and group bioimpedance were plotted within tolerance and 95% confidence ellipses. Body fat percentage (F = 70.6, p < 0.001, ηp2 = 0.42) and resistance/height (F = 36.4, p < 0.001, ηp2 = 0.27) differed between normal-weight, overweight, and obese groups. Reactance/height (F = 36.4, p < 0.001, ηp2 = 0.27) and phase angle (F = 4.77, p = 0.01, ηp2 = 0.05) only differed between normal-weight and obese groups. When plotted with 95% BIVA confidence ellipses, BMI categories occupied distinct positions from each other (T2 = 16.1 − 66.6, D = 0.68 − 1.48, p < 0.05). Within BIVA tolerance ellipses, overweight and obese categories fell in the “obese” quadrant, while the normal-weight category fell in the “athletic” quadrant. However, individual participants were predominantly scattered throughout the “cachectic,” “obese,” and “athletic” quadrants regardless of BMI. These findings suggest that BMI appears to be adequate for assessing population averages but not individual body composition. Future research should investigate the utility of bioelectrical resistance as a marker of obesity.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** obese (MESH:D009765), adiposity (MESH:D018205), overweight (MESH:D050177)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12252277/full.md

## Figures

6 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12252277/full.md

## References

57 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12252277/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12252277