# Technical Validation of a Training Workstation for Magnet-Based Ultrasound Guidance of Fine-Needle Punctures

## TL;DR

This study tests a training workstation for magnet-based ultrasound guidance of fine-needle punctures, showing it is reliable but has minor deviations that increase with thin or long needles.

## Contribution

The study validates a training workstation for magnet-based ultrasound guidance using standard needles in educational settings.

## Key findings

- The workstation achieved its target in all 240 phantom punctures without system failures.
- Needle tip movement, tilt, and penetration depth showed minor deviations, increasing with thin or long needles.
- The system is suitable for training but should not be solely relied on for complex clinical scenarios.

## Abstract

It has been demonstrated that needle guidance systems can enhance the precision and safety of ultrasound-guided punctures in human medicine. Systems that permit the utilization of commercially available standard needles, instead of those that necessitate the acquisition of costly, proprietary needles, are of particular interest. The objective of this phantom study is to evaluate the reliability and accuracy of magnet-based ultrasound needle guidance systems, which superimpose the position of the needle tip and a predictive trajectory line on the live ultrasound image. We conducted fine-needle aspiration cytology of thyroid nodules. The needles utilized in these procedures are of a slender gauge (21–27G), with lengths ranging from 40 to 80 mm. A dedicated training workstation with integrated software-based analyses of the movement of the needle tip was utilized in 240 standardized phantom punctures (angle: 45°; target depth: 20 mm). No system failures occurred, and the target achieved its aim in all cases. The analysis of the software revealed stable procedural parameters with minor relative deviations from the predefined reference values regarding the distance of needle tip movement (−4.2% to +6.7%), needle tilt (−6.4% to +9.6%), and penetration depth (−7.5% to +4.5%). These deviations appeared to increase with the use of thin needles and, to a lesser extent, long needles. They are attributed to the slight bending of the needle inside the (phantom) tissue. The training workstation we employed is thus suitable for use in educational settings. Nevertheless, in intricate clinical puncture scenarios—for instance, in the case of unfavorable localized small lesions near critical anatomical structures, particularly those involving thin needles—caution is advised, and the system should not be relied upon exclusively.