# Intramolecular Versus Intermolecular Bonding in Drug Gemcitabine and Nucleobases: A Computational Study

**Authors:** Natarajan Sathiyamoorthy Venkataramanan, Ambigapathy Suvitha, Ryoji Sahara

PMC · DOI: 10.3390/molecules30132732 · 2025-06-25

## TL;DR

This study uses computational methods to analyze how gemcitabine interacts with nucleobases, focusing on the strength and nature of the bonds formed.

## Contribution

The paper provides new insights into the relative strength of intermolecular versus intramolecular bonds in gemcitabine–nucleobase complexes.

## Key findings

- Intermolecular hydrogen bonds in gemcitabine–nucleobase complexes are stronger than intramolecular bonds.
- Gemcitabine–guanine complexes show the highest binding energy, while gemcitabine–thymine complexes show the lowest.
- Electrostatic attraction is the main contributor to complex stability, with dispersion playing a minor role.

## Abstract

The adsorption of the drug gemcitabine on nucleobases was investigated using a dispersion-corrected density functional theory (DFT) study. The planar structure of complexes is more stable than those with stacked and buckle-angled configurations. The complexes were found to possess at least two intermolecular hydrogen bonds. The binding energy and interaction energy are both negative, with the highest values observed for the gemcitabine–guanine and the lowest in the gemcitabine–thymine complex. The complex formation was found to be an enthalpy-driven process. Pyrimidine nucleobases have a lower enthalpy of formation than purine nucleobases. The computed HOMA and NICS values on the gemcitabine–nucleobase complexes show a substantial increase compared to the pristine nucleobases. An MESP analysis of the complexes shows a directional interaction and electron density shift between the gemcitabine and the nucleobases. A QTAIM analysis indicates that the intermolecular hydrogen bonds have a partial covalent character. The computed bond energy demonstrates that intermolecular NH⋅⋅⋅N bonds are more potent than other bonds. An energy decomposition analysis using the DLPNO−CCSD(T) method indicates that the complexes exhibit a substantial electrostatic attraction, and dispersion contributes the least towards the system stability. The intermolecular bonds are stronger than the intramolecular bonds in the drug–nucleobase complexes. The strength of intramolecular bonds is determined by the deformation of the gemcitabine ring during the complex formation.

## Linked entities

- **Chemicals:** gemcitabine (PubChem CID 60750)

## Full-text entities

- **Chemicals:** purine (MESH:C030985), Gemcitabine (MESH:D000093542), Pyrimidine (MESH:C030986), Nucleobases (-), hydrogen (MESH:D006859), thymine (MESH:D013941)

## Figures

5 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12251269/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12251269