Investigation of the Impact of Clinker Grinding Conditions on Energy Consumption and Ball Fineness Parameters Using Statistical and Machine Learning Approaches in a Bond Ball Mill
Yahya Kaya, Veysel Kobya, Gulveren Tabansiz-Goc, Naz Mardani, Fatih Cavdur, Ali Mardani

TL;DR
This study uses machine learning to predict energy consumption and fineness in cement clinker grinding, showing that support vector regression is the most accurate method.
Contribution
The study introduces machine learning models for optimizing cement grinding parameters, with a novel focus on support vector regression's superior performance.
Findings
Support vector regression (SVR) outperformed gradient boosting and ridge regression in predicting energy consumption and Blaine fineness.
Machine learning models effectively estimated grinding parameters with high R2 and low error metrics.
Feature selection methods like mutual info regression and lasso regression identified key variables for prediction.
Abstract
This study explores the application of machine learning (ML) techniques—gradient boosting (GB), ridge regression (RR), and support vector regression (SVR)—for estimating the consumption of energy (CE) and Blaine fineness (BF) in cement clinker grinding. This study utilizes key clinker grinding parameters, such as maximum ball size, ball filling ratio, clinker mass, rotation speed, and number of revolutions, as input features. Through comprehensive preprocessing, feature selection methods (mutual info regression (MIR), lasso regression (LR), and sequential backward selection (SBS)) were employed to identify the most significant variables for predicting CE and BF. The performance of the models was optimized using a grid search for hyperparameter tuning and validated using k-fold cross-validation (k = 10). The results show that all ML methods effectively estimated the target parameters,…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMineral Processing and Grinding · Advanced machining processes and optimization · Advanced Machining and Optimization Techniques
