Effect of Complete Revascularization in STEMI: Ischemia-Driven Rehospitalization and Cardiovascular Mortality

TL;DR

Complete revascularization in STEMI patients with multiple coronary artery blockages may reduce rehospitalizations and cardiovascular deaths, but other factors like age and kidney disease are key predictors.

Contribution

This study identifies independent predictors of rehospitalization and cardiovascular mortality in STEMI patients, beyond the revascularization method.

Findings

Complete revascularization was linked to lower combined endpoint rates compared to incomplete revascularization.

Cardiogenic shock, kidney failure, and age over 70 were significant risk factors for the combined endpoint.

After adjusting for confounders, revascularization method did not significantly affect cardiovascular mortality.

Abstract

Background: Patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and multivessel coronary artery disease (MVD) who undergo complete revascularization (CR) have a more favorable prognosis than those who receive incomplete revascularization (IR), as evidenced by recent randomized controlled trials. Despite the absence of a survival benefit associated with CR in these trials, positive outcomes were ascribed to combined endpoints, such as repeat revascularization, myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven rehospitalization. In light of the significant burden that rehospitalization from STEMI imposes on healthcare systems, we examined the long-term effects of CR on ischemia-driven rehospitalization and cardiovascular (CV) mortality in STEMI patients with MVD. Methods: In our retrospective study, we included patients with STEMI and MVD who underwent successful primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) at the University Medical Centre Ljubljana between 1 January 2009, and 11 April 2011. The combined endpoint was ischemia-driven rehospitalization and CV mortality, with a minimum follow-up period of six years. Results: We included 235 participants who underwent CR (N = 70) or IR (N = 165) at index hospitalization, with a median follow-up time of 7 years (interquartile range 6.0–8.2). The primary endpoint was significantly higher in the IR group than in the CR group (47.3% vs. 32.9%, log-rank p = 0.025), driven by CV mortality (23.6% vs. 12.9%, log-rank p = 0.047), as there was no difference in ischemia-driven rehospitalization rate (log-rank p = 0.206). Ischemia-driven rehospitalization did not influence CV mortality in the CR group (p = 0.49), while it significantly impacted CV mortality in the IR group (p = 0.03). After adjusting for confounders, there were no differences in CV mortality between CR and IR groups (p = 0.622). Predictors of the combined endpoint included age (p = 0.014), diabetes (p = 0.006), chronic kidney disease (CKD) (p = 0.001), cardiogenic shock at presentation (p = 0.003), chronic total occlusion (CTO) (p = 0.046), and ischemia-driven rehospitalization (p = 0.0001). Significant risk factors for the combined endpoint were cardiogenic shock at presentation (p < 0.001), stage 4 kidney failure (p = 0.001), age over 70 years (p = 0.004), female gender (p = 0.008), and residual SYNTAX I score > 5.5 (p = 0.017). Conclusions: Patients with STEMI and MVD who underwent CR had a lower combined endpoint of ischemia-driven rehospitalizations and CV mortality than IR patients, but after adjustments for confounders, the true determinants of the combined endpoint and risk factors for the combined endpoint were independent of the revascularization method.

Figures