# Development of an HPTLC-MS Method for the Differentiation of Celosiae Semen: Celosia argentea Versus C. cristata

**Authors:** Kyu Won Kim, Geonha Park, Sejin Ku, Young Pyo Jang

PMC · DOI: 10.3390/molecules30132786 · 2025-06-28

## TL;DR

This study develops a method using imaging and HPTLC-MS to distinguish between two similar medicinal seeds, CAS and CCS, for better quality control.

## Contribution

The study introduces an integrative method combining digital image analysis and HPTLC-MS for accurate differentiation of CAS and CCS.

## Key findings

- CCS has a projection area over twice that of CAS based on digital image analysis.
- Celosin F is exclusive to CAS, while celosin H, J, and K are characteristic of CCS.
- The method showed high repeatability with low standard deviations for sucrose measurements.

## Abstract

Celosiae Argentea Semen (CAS), derived from Celosia argentea L., is traditionally used in Korean and Chinese medicine to treat eye disorders and liver heat and is recognized in official Pharmacopeias. In contrast, Celosiae Cristatae Semen (CCS), despite its frequent presence in the market, is not officially listed. The morphological and chemical similarities between the two pose challenges for accurate identification. This study presents an integrative method combining digital image analysis and high-performance thin-layer chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry (HPTLC-MS) to differentiate CAS from CCS. Digital microscopy and ImageJ analysis showed that CCS has a projection area over twice that of CAS. Chemically, an optimized HPTLC method using ethyl acetate, methanol, water, and formic acid revealed distinct fingerprint patterns under UV 366 nm and white light. Notably, celosin F was exclusively detected in CAS, while celosin H, J, and K were characteristic of CCS. ESI-TOF-MS analysis confirmed these markers, resolving an overlap in RF values. Repeatability tests showed total SDs of sucrose for intra-day, inter-day, and inter-analysis precision were 0.006, 0.004, and 0.005, respectively, confirming method reliability. This combined approach offers a rapid, reliable, and practical tool for distinguishing these two medicinal seeds, supporting enhanced quality control and regulatory standardization in pharmaceutical applications.

## Linked entities

- **Chemicals:** ethyl acetate (PubChem CID 8857), methanol (PubChem CID 887), water (PubChem CID 962), formic acid (PubChem CID 284), celosin F (PubChem CID 53236072), celosin H (PubChem CID 162853581), celosin J (PubChem CID 156599178), celosin K (PubChem CID 168679887), sucrose (PubChem CID 5988)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** eye disorders (MESH:D005128)
- **Chemicals:** methanol (MESH:D000432), ethyl acetate (MESH:C007650), CAS (-), sucrose (MESH:D013395), formic acid (MESH:C030544), water (MESH:D014867)
- **Species:** Celosia argentea (quail grass, species) [taxon 46112]

## Figures

4 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12250623/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12250623