Risk seeking or averse, how do analyst coverage and firm visits motivate managers?
Hangbo Liu, Xuemeng Guo, Dachen Sheng
TL;DR
The paper examines how institutional analyst visits influence corporate risk-taking in Chinese firms, finding that visits increase risk-taking, but this effect is reduced in state-owned enterprises with strong management control.
Contribution
The study reveals how political connections and ownership structure moderate the impact of analyst visits on managerial risk-taking.
Findings
More frequent analyst visits lead to increased risk-taking and lower earnings quality in firms.
In state-owned enterprises, concentrated shareholding and management power reduce risk-taking.
Political connections make managers in SOEs more risk-averse under market scrutiny.
Abstract
In this research, we use Chinese stock exchange listed firm data to explore the relationship between institutional analysts’ firm visits and firms’ risk-taking as measured by earnings quality. The results show that more frequent visits in the previous year increase managers’ risk-taking decisions in later years and that firms experience lower earnings quality. Interestingly, the concentration of shareholding and management power, traditionally believed to be negative corporate governance instruments, alleviate such risk-taking if a firm is a state-owned enterprise (SOE). For non-SOEs, the more concentrated the shareholding and management power the further the risks increase. These results are attributed to the political connection of the manager, which would make managers more risk averse when under market focus and minimize risks that would damage their reputation and political career.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12
Figure 13
Figure 14
Figure 15
Figure 16
Figure 17
Figure 18
Figure 19
Figure 20
Figure 21
Figure 22
Figure 23
Figure 24
Figure 25
Figure 26
Figure 27
Figure 28
Figure 29
Figure 30
Figure 31
Figure 32
Figure 33
Figure 34
Figure 35
Figure 36
Figure 37
Figure 38
Figure 39
Figure 40
Figure 41
Figure 42
Figure 43
Figure 44
Figure 45
Figure 46
Figure 47
Figure 48
Figure 49
Figure 50Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAuditing, Earnings Management, Governance · Corporate Finance and Governance · Financial Markets and Investment Strategies