# Bifocal Radial Fracture/Dislocation and Distal Ulnar Fracture—A Rare Case of Proximal Forearm Instability Not Yet Classified and Literature Review

## TL;DR

A rare forearm injury combining features of multiple fracture types is reported, highlighting the need for better classification and treatment strategies.

## Contribution

Presentation of a previously unreported hybrid forearm injury variant not classified in existing systems.

## Key findings

- The case involved a complex injury with radial head fracture/dislocation, radial shaft fracture, and distal ulna fracture.
- Successful surgical management led to full elbow motion recovery but residual pronation/supination deficits.
- Current classification systems are inadequate for such hybrid forearm injuries.

## Abstract

Introduction: Monteggia fractures, first described by Giovanni Battista Monteggia, involve a fracture of the proximal ulna with anterior dislocation of the radial head. Bado’s 1967 classification divides these injuries into four types. Rare mixed patterns exist, overlapping with other forearm injuries such as Galeazzi and Essex–Lopresti lesions. These complex fractures/dislocations pose significant diagnostic and therapeutic challenges and are not adequately represented in current classification systems. Methods and Case Presentation: We report the case of a 56-year-old woman with a complex forearm injury sustained from a fall, presenting with radial head fracture/dislocation, mid-shaft radial fracture, distal ulna fracture, and ulnar collateral ligament rupture. Intraoperative imaging confirmed DRUJ stability and partial interosseous membrane disruption. Surgical management included radial head prosthesis implantation, radial shaft fixation with an anatomical locking plate, intramedullary nailing of the distal ulna, and ligament reconstruction. At two-year follow-up, the patient demonstrated full recovery of elbow flexion–extension and satisfactory forearm function. A narrative literature review was also conducted, focusing on hybrid injury variants. Results: Intraoperative examination under anesthesia revealed good elbow stability with 130° flexion, 15° extension lag, and forearm pronation/supination of 70°/60°. An initial Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) of 65 was recorded, limited by range of motion and stability. Pain during passive mobilization was mild, with a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score of 3/10. Postoperative recovery included 15 days of immobilization followed by structured rehabilitation. At two years, the patient regained full elbow flexion–extension but had residual deficits in pronation–supination, attributed to pre-existing conditions. Conclusions: This case illustrates a previously unreported hybrid Monteggia variant, combining features of Monteggia, Galeazzi, and Essex–Lopresti injuries. It highlights the limitations of current classification systems and supports the need for an expanded diagnostic framework. Successful management required a multidisciplinary surgical approach tailored to the injury’s complexity. Further studies are warranted to refine classification and treatment strategies for these rare combined injuries.