# An Imaging-Based Marker to Refine Risk Stratification for Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement

**Authors:** Liliane Zillner, Mirjam G. Wild, Michaela M. Hell, Harald Herkner, Elmar W. Kuhn, Tanja Rudolph, Thomas Walther, Lenard Conradi, Andreas Zierer, Francesco Maisano, Marco Russo, Fabrizio Rosati, Andrea Colli, Miguel Piñón, David Reineke, Gaby Aphram, Tillmann Kerbel, Christophe Dubois, Jörg Hausleiter, Ralph Stephan von Bardeleben, Markus Mach, Christian Loewe, Martin Andreas

PMC · DOI: 10.3390/jcm14134412 · Journal of Clinical Medicine · 2025-06-20

## TL;DR

This study identifies a new imaging-based marker, LVEDDi, that can help predict risk and improve patient selection for a heart valve procedure called TMVR.

## Contribution

LVEDDi is identified as a novel and clinically relevant predictor of in-hospital mortality in TMVR patients.

## Key findings

- Lower LVEDDi values were significantly associated with higher in-hospital mortality after TMVR.
- LVEDDi remained an independent predictor of mortality even when combined with other risk factors.
- LVEDDi is a robust and easily calculable marker that can improve patient screening for TMVR.

## Abstract

Background: The Tendyne™ transcatheter heart valve (THV) system is a promising option for high-risk patients with severe mitral regurgitation (MR) who are ineligible for surgery or transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER). As most fatal complications occur within the first 90 days, this study aimed to identify anatomical predictors of in-hospital mortality after transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR). Methods: In this subanalysis of the TENDER registry, data from 110 patients who underwent TMVR across 26 centers between January 2020 and June 2022 were evaluated. Preprocedural imaging parameters were analyzed, including transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), and cardiac 4D computed tomography (CT). Results: We identified LVEDDi as a significant predictor of in-hospital mortality (p = 0.022), with lower values in non-survivors (26.42 ± 3.76 mm/m2) than in survivors (30.37 ± 5.58 mm/m2). Both indexed and absolute LVEDDi predicted in-hospital complications (p < 0.001 and p = 0.008). In multivariate analysis, LVEDDi (p = 0.048; OR = 0.856) and STS score (p = 0.038; OR = 1.114) remained independent predictors of in-hospital mortality. In an extended model, only LVEDDi persisted as a significant predictor (p = 0.007), highlighting its robustness. Conclusions: This analysis identified a small LVEDDi as a novel, clinically relevant risk factor in TMVR and showed its added value alongside conventional markers. Its easy calculation supports incorporating LVEDDi thresholds into screening to improve patient selection and outcomes.

## Full-text entities

- **Genes:** STS (steroid sulfatase) [NCBI Gene 412] {aka ARSC, ARSC1, ASC, ES, SSDD, XLI}
- **Diseases:** MR (MESH:D008944)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12249964/full.md

## Figures

4 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12249964/full.md

## References

31 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12249964/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12249964