# Italian Honeydew Honey Characterization by 1H NMR Spectroscopy

**Authors:** Dalila Iannone, Laura Ruth Cagliani, Roberto Consonni

PMC · DOI: 10.3390/foods14132234 · Foods · 2025-06-25

## TL;DR

This study uses NMR spectroscopy to distinguish the botanical origins of Italian honeydew honey based on its chemical composition.

## Contribution

The paper introduces a novel NMR-based method to chemically characterize and classify different types of honeydew honey.

## Key findings

- Fir, oak, and eucalyptus honeydew honeys were well discriminated based on their unique sugar profiles.
- Citrus fruits and forest honeydew honeys could not be reliably distinguished using the method.
- Specific sugars like melezitose and isomaltose were identified as markers for certain honeydew types.

## Abstract

Honeydew honey represents a bee-derived product with different organoleptic characteristics and distinct properties with respect to floral honey. The market interest in honeydew honey has been growing in recent years due to its higher bioactive characteristics with respect to floral honey. The need for a deeper chemical characterization aimed to evaluate a possible botanical differentiation attracted the use of different analytical approaches. The present work aims to distinguish the botanical honeydew origin by using Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) spectroscopy and a multivariate approach. Two different data pretreatments have been considered to obtain the best sample discrimination. The saccharide content significantly affects the differentiation of the botanical variety consisting of fir, oak, citrus fruits, eucalyptus, and forest mainly by using a classification approach taking advantage of the Orthogonal Signal Correction filters. Notwithstanding the botanical diversity of the honeydew honey (HDH) samples, fir honeydew (F-HDH), oak honeydew (O-HDH), and eucalyptus honeydew (E-HDH) resulted always well discriminated among all the botanical varieties investigated, while citrus fruits honeydew (CF-HD) and forest honeydew (FO-HDH) did not. In particular, F-HDH resulted characterized by sucrose, erlose, maltose, maltotriose, maltotetraose, and melezitose, E-HDH resulted enriched in α, β-glucose and β-fructose in furanosidic form, and O-HDH enriched in β-fructose in furanosidic form, isomaltose.

## Linked entities

- **Chemicals:** sucrose (PubChem CID 5988), erlose (PubChem CID 193471), maltose (PubChem CID 439186), maltotriose (PubChem CID 92146), maltotetraose (PubChem CID 123966), melezitose (PubChem CID 92817), α-glucose (PubChem CID 79025), isomaltose (PubChem CID 439193)

## Full-text entities

- **Chemicals:** melezitose (MESH:C005190), maltotetraose (MESH:C009819), erlose (MESH:C026440), maltotriose (MESH:C008317), sucrose (MESH:D013395), isomaltose (MESH:D007534), 1H (-), saccharide (MESH:D002241), maltose (MESH:D008320)
- **Species:** Eucalyptus (genus) [taxon 3932], Cucumis melo var. inodorus (casaba melon, varietas) [taxon 357961]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12249152/full.md

## Figures

5 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12249152/full.md

## References

35 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12249152/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12249152