# YouTube as a Source of Patient Information for Cerebral Palsy

## TL;DR

This study found that YouTube videos about cerebral palsy generally provide poor-quality information for patients and their families.

## Contribution

The study evaluates the quality of YouTube content on cerebral palsy using standardized medical information quality scales.

## Key findings

- The average DISCERN score for YouTube videos was low, indicating poor quality information.
- Videos with treatment options, risk factors, and patient experiences scored higher in quality assessments.
- Audience engagement metrics were analyzed alongside quality scores to evaluate content effectiveness.

## Abstract

Background/objectives: Social media has significantly enhanced access to medical knowledge by enabling rapid information sharing. With YouTube being the second-most popular website, we intended to evaluate the quality of its content as a source of information for patients and relatives for information about cerebral palsy. Methods: The first 30 videos for search terms “Cerebral palsy”, “Spastic cerebral palsy”, “Dyskinetic cerebral palsy”, “Worster-Drought syndrome”, and “Ataxic cerebral palsy” were selected for inquiry. Out of 150 films, a total of 83 were assessed with a mixed method approach by two independent raters utilizing evidence-based quality scales such as Quality Criteria for Consumer Health Information (DISCERN), the Journal of the American Medical Association instrument (JAMA), and the Global Quality Score (GQS). Furthermore, audience engagement was analyzed, and the Video Power Index (VPI) was calculated for each video. Results: The mean total DISCERN score excluding the final question (subjective assessment of the video) was 30.5 ± 8.7 (out of 75 points), implying that the quality of the videos was poor. The global JAMA score was 2.36 ± 0.57 between the raters. The mean GQS score reached 2.57 ± 0.78. The videos had statistically higher DISCERN scores when they included treatment options, risk factors, anatomy, definition, information for doctors, epidemiology, doctor as a speaker, and patient experience. Conclusions: YouTube seems to be a poor source of information for patients and relatives on cerebral palsy. The analysis can contribute to creating more engaging, holistic, and informative videos regarding this topic.