# Factors that influence inter-organisational integration: a qualitative exploration of service providers’ perspectives from an integrated care initiative

**Authors:** Fani Liapi, Angel Marie Chater, Gurch Randhawa, Amy Stephenson, Yannis Pappas

PMC · DOI: 10.1186/s12913-025-13051-7 · BMC Health Services Research · 2025-07-10

## TL;DR

This study explores what helps or hinders collaboration between healthcare organizations in a UK integrated care program, based on interviews with service providers.

## Contribution

The study provides new insights into inter-organisational integration in integrated care through a qualitative analysis of service providers' perspectives.

## Key findings

- Strong relationships and staff motivation were key facilitators of integration.
- High staff turnover and lack of shared IT systems were major barriers.
- Discrepancies were found between expected and actual integration outcomes.

## Abstract

Integrated care uses inter-professional and inter-organisational collaboration to ensure quality care for those with complex healthcare needs. Whilst inter-organisational collaboration is seen as a facilitator of integration, it has its own complexities and challenges. This study sought to investigate barriers to and facilitators of inter-organisational integration between the partnered organisations of an integrated care initiative in Luton, UK, as perceived by healthcare professionals.

Face to face semi – structured interviews were conducted between November 2019 and March 2020 with twenty service providers of an integrated service for physical and mental health. Thematic analysis was used to explore the experiences and perceptions of service providers on the integration of healthy lifestyle and mental health services of “Total Wellbeing Luton”.

Five primary themes were identified: (1) Culture, (2) Communication Structures, (3) Strategic alignment, (4) Workforce dynamics, and (5) Expectation and reality of the integration. The majority of the identified themes reflect factors that facilitate or impede the integration between the participating organisations. Excellent relationships between healthcare professionals and staff’s motivation have been identified as facilitators to inter-organisational integration, while high staff turnover, lack of shared IT system and absence of co-location have been identified as barriers. Also, a theme reveals that often there was a discrepancy between the expected and the actual implementation and outcomes of integration.

As a part of a larger evaluation programme, this study attempts a comprehensive understanding of the inter-organisational integration in the specific context of Total Wellbeing Luton. The findings and recommendations can support the inter-organisational integration of current and future integrated care initiatives in the UK and elsewhere.

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-025-13051-7.

## Full-text entities

- **Genes:** BCAR1 (BCAR1 scaffold protein, Cas family member) [NCBI Gene 9564] {aka CAS, CAS1, CASS1, CRKAS, P130Cas}
- **Diseases:** TWL (MESH:C563627), weight (MESH:D015431), mental health disorders (OMIM:603663), overweight (MESH:D050177), depression (MESH:D003866), Obesity (MESH:D009765), anxiety disorders (MESH:D001008), mental illness (MESH:D001523)
- **Chemicals:** ICS (-)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12247228/full.md

## References

37 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12247228/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12247228