Exergy and Exergoeconomic Analysis of the Gas Subcooled Process for the Brazilian Market: An Approach to Enhance Natural Gas Liquids Recovery
Isidro Alejandro Argueta Flores, Ana Paula Meneguelo, Cintia Marangoni, Yuri Nascimento Nariyoshi, Marcelo Silveira Bacelos

TL;DR
This study evaluates different gas subcooled process designs in Brazil to improve natural gas liquids recovery by analyzing energy efficiency and costs.
Contribution
The novel contribution is the detailed exergy and exergoeconomic analysis of four GSP configurations to identify thermodynamic and economic inefficiencies.
Findings
The Turbo-Expander (TE) configuration achieves the highest exergy efficiency at 71%.
The TEMR setup has the highest exergy destruction cost at US $5687/h due to energy-intensive refrigeration.
The analysis provides actionable insights for improving GSP system design and infrastructure modernization.
Abstract
The gas subcooled process (GSP) is the most widely adopted natural gas liquid (NGL) recovery method due to its adaptability to varying gas compositions and its alignment with the market emphasis in Brazil on lighter hydrocarbons. However, the process remains limited by high energy consumption and significant thermodynamic inefficiencies, particularly in the expansion and separation stages. To address these drawbacks, this research employs a detailed exergy and exergoeconomic assessment of four GSP configurations, termed Turbo-Expander (TE), Joule–Thomson (JT), Turbo-Expander with Mechanical Refrigeration (TEMR), and Joule-Thomson with Mechanical Refrigeration (JTMR), to identify and quantify the sources of energy degradation and their associated economic impacts. The results reveal that the TE configuration achieves the highest exergy efficiency (71%) and demonstrates superior cost…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12
Figure 13
Figure 14
Figure 15
Figure 16
Figure 17
Figure 18
Figure 19
Figure 20
Figure 21
Figure 22
Figure 23
Figure 24
Figure 25
Figure 26
Figure 27
Figure 28
Figure 29
Figure 30
Figure 31
Figure 32
Figure 33
Figure 34
Figure 35
Figure 36
Figure 37
Figure 38
Figure 39
Figure 40
Figure 41
Figure 42
Figure 43
Figure 44
Figure 45
Figure 46
Figure 47
Figure 48
Figure 49
Figure 50Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsThermodynamic and Exergetic Analyses of Power and Cooling Systems · Global Energy and Sustainability Research · Process Optimization and Integration
