To Prescribe or Not to Prescribe: A Quality Improvement Project in Improving Resident Doctors’ Confidence in Managing Acute Behavioural Disturbance
Zuhair Ahmad, Rooble Ali, Deenan Edward

TL;DR
This study aimed to improve resident doctors' confidence in managing acute behavioral disturbances through a quality improvement project.
Contribution
The study introduced a targeted educational intervention that significantly increased resident doctors' confidence in managing acute behavioral disturbances.
Findings
Confidence in using non-pharmacological approaches improved by 21%.
Confidence in prescribing for acute disturbances improved by 32%.
Overall confidence in managing delirious patients improved by 26%.
Abstract
Aims: The management of acute behavioural disturbances necessitates an appreciation for the potential methods, risks, and monitoring requirements needed following assessment and initiation of management. A previous quality improvement project highlighted variability in clinicians initiating rapid tranquillisation agents in response to the same clinical vignette. This study aimed to improve Resident doctors’ confidence in deciding to use pharmacological or non-pharmacological methods in managing acute disturbance by 25%. Methods: Initially, a fishbone diagram was created to help visualise the possible causes contributing towards lack of confidence in managing acute behavioural disturbance via word-of-mouth conversations. Subsequently, a quantitative survey was circulated amongst 25 resident doctors in a single district general hospital. The survey consisted of questions using a 5-point…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHealthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
